The Disinformation and Obfuscation in the Debunking of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.
Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook (Zionist, Kabbalist, first Ashkenazi chief Rabbi of British Mandate for Palestine) Similar quote found in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was publicly declared a forgery in 1921 via several articles published in The Times (of London) by Philip Graves. Graves claimed to have gotten the evidence for the debunking from someone known only as Mr. X.
Mr. X., who does not wish his real name to be known, is a Russian landowner with English connexions. Orthodox by religion, he is in Political opinion a Constitutional Monarchist. He came here as a refugee after the final failure of the White cause in South Russia. He had long been interested in the Jewish question as far as it concerned Russia, had studied the “Protocols,” and during the period of Denikin’s ascendancy had made investigations with the object of discovering whether any occult “Masonic” organization, such as the “Protocols” speak of, existed in Southern Russia. The only such organization was a Monarchist one. The discovery of the key to the problem of the “Protocols” came to him by chance.
This blurb is important because in a time when the democratic "new world order" (and Bolshevism) was being established from the fall of the remnants of monarchism, Graves, via Mr. X, is saying that the only grand conspiracy involving occult organizations was a monarchist one (thus it involved the other less liked, but tolerated, group of people).

While I do know that monarchist conspiracies still exist (I've seen the organizations/orders myself, however pitiful they may be in instituting their aims), monarchists were hardly the grand schemers of the day (or today) when they were detested by the Left and the Right equally, and generally focused only on their own territories (the issue of monarchy with constitution or without being an additional matter and stumbling block). Nevermind that anyone with any basic knowledge of occultism knows that the only monarchy that such types would ever support is that of the World-King in whatever name he may be known (Horus, Messiah, King etc).

As Albert Camus one explained, monarchies symbolized the law of God and occultists in their various forms, say that such laws are oppressive variations of the "true laws" that had been distorted by "narrow-minded uninitiated monotheists." There are many in the occult realm who simply say: "Do what thou whilt is the whole of the law" and trace it back through time, claiming that what it says is not what it means. So if Mr. X had in fact come across a grand monarchist conspiracy, it most certainly wasn't occultic in the sense of what the Protocols produce.

None of this information (that is, the nature of occult organizations, or their beliefs) is hidden or has ever really been hidden, and yet is profusely denied and considered by the majority of people to be fanciful. It's just like when Freemasons deny they are a Zionist organization. It's completely and utterly ridiculous since the Temple of Solomon is of immense importance in Masonry (part of what "masonry" refers to), and when some of the most famous Freemasons (Isaac Newton and Harry Truman for easy examples) were extreme Zionists, and any cursory study of the architecture of Israel's most important buildings shows Masonic influence.

The point of this blog post is that the entire debunking of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is based on the fact that (in typical Masonic fashion) some mysterious person revealed a previous work from which it was plagiarized, and so people conclude that everything in the Protocols is false--too sinister to be true, especially because of its heavy antisemitism.

The Italian philosopher, mystic, and political theorist Julius Evola said in his preface to the Protocols,
This argument is truly irrelevant: those who decry plagiarism should keep in mind that this is not a matter of a literary work or of copyright. For example, when a general writes a plan, he could employ previous materials and writings as long as they contain ideas fit for his purpose. This would be a case of plagiarism, but it would not affect at all the question of whether or not this plan has really been conceived and carried out.
The Protocols being a complete fake in every respect is an easy conclusion to arrive at when one is ignorant of the machinations and mental confusing that Masons and their ilk indulge in (already mentioned above an example of occultists claiming phrases don't mean what they say, and Ibn Sayyad is an excellent example). The stereotype of the villain needing to reveal his plans in great detail before acting is based on truth and the very human reality of needing to betray one's deceits whether through body language or words.

Many bloggers and website owners, some antisemitic and others not, have already expounded on the motivations for why Protocols would focus on portraying Jews as the villains of the world. In sum: to deflect attention from those who are really pulling the strings (yes, the basis of it is Zionist-Masonic conspiracy, but there is a particular Judaic flare to it that is reflected on Jews of all backgrounds, and it ignores gentiles who misuse Judaism for their own gains), and to aid in the persecution of Jews which would give an easy excuse for the settlement of Jerusalem and establishment of Israel for the eventual return of the Temple and the ushering in of the World-King/Messiah/Horus aka Dajjal (and extermination of religious Jews, just like the most religious of any group are often the main target).


The Protocols don't reflect the attitudes of Zionists at all...nevermind all those statements from Zionists that match up with them!

In 2008 John Hagee, the infamous ultra-Christian Zionist who wrote In Defense of Israel stated that Hitler was sent by God to hunt European Jews in order to chase them to Israel for the set-up for the End Times, essentially. Pretty much everyone decried him as an antisemite, a man whose whole purpose is the support of Israel and Zionism. It seems to be the case that whenever Zionists are blunt about their beliefs and purposes, they're--at least in front of the eye of the media--are shunned and criticized despite the fact that non-Zionists have exposed said beliefs before, the Protocols being an excellent example if you peel away the bullshit.

The arguments that assert there are no evil Jews (because Jews aren't human beings, I guess) or Zionism isn't a sinister occult-based secularist ideology at its core are without legs to stand on. Ignoring the Palestinian slow genocide/apartheid (others cover that in great detail, my focus is on the occult), I can prove that there is truth to the essential core of the Protocols with merely quotes.

First I must briefly address the antisemitism found in the Protocols. In many respects what was done was that goyim was written where profane should have been i.e. the whole thing being about the fake Judaism of Zionism where Judaism is used and abused for worldly, ungodly purposes. The trick of the Protocols was to put a Kabbalah-based occult agenda onto the Jews of the world, despite the fact that the majority of the practitioners of Masonic-Kabbalah (back then) were gentiles, and that, at least in places like Russia, Jews and especially Jewish practitioners of Kabbalah had to be recruited into Masonic lodges in order for the Masons to get "street cred," so to speak.

The problem has and always will be the occult, regardless of what name it takes. In today's world, in practically every religious tradition the "spiritual" traditions are considered valid and sometimes essential (because of how the world is being subconsciously steered). The acceptance and love of the spiritual traditions is not in line with traditional monotheism that was taught by the prophets, which had a spiritual element built into it without the need of practicing secret teachings, levels of initiation, magical incantations, trances or any other devices that the prophets themselves did not do (although many disagree with that, hence the origins of many traditions). In the past I briefly touched on this with the subject of Solomon and the commonly held belief that he used magic. Merkaba Mysticism, which may have been used by Dajjal (the antichrist) himself is another example of prophets being used as an excuse to indulge in the occult/prophets being mistaken as utilizing the occult.

While everyone seems to focus on the supposed positives of spiritual traditions like Kabbalah, few seem to ever mention the dark sides that are not hidden but plainly discussed as if the teachings are perfectly acceptable. You can find no such teachings in Islam (except possibly Sufism), despite the fact that Zionists criticize Islam heavily.
Since God creates souls, he can choose to create them in different ways. This is precisely the express position of the Zohar. Jews are differentiated from Gentiles by the fact that Jewish souls are different from (and superior to) Gentile souls[…] The Zohar meets the problem of conversion in two ways. One is to affirm that the proselyte never becomes the equal of the Jew. Alternatively, souls of true converts are souls of Jewish origin and were at Sinai with all other Jewish souls. That these souls ended up in the bodies of Gentiles is, apparently, the result of some sort of cosmic foul-up. - Maimonides on Judaism and the Jewish People, Menachem Marc Kellner, pp. 5-6
A blurb on Wikipedia sums this up:
Many Kabbalistic sources contain statements to the effect that the Jewish soul is ontologically different from the soul of non-Jews; for example, it is held by some that Jews have three levels of soul, nefesh, ruach and neshamah while non-Jews have only nefesh. The Zohar comments on the Biblical verse which states 'Let the waters teem with swarms of creatures that have a living soul' as follows: The verse 'creatures that have a living soul,' pertains to the Jews, for they are the children of God, and from God come their holy souls....And the souls of the other nations, from where do they come? Rabbi Elazar says that they have souls from the impure left side, and therefore they are all impure, defiling anyone who comes near them. (Zohar commentary on Genesis)
Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky explain in Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (p. 6) the Kabbalah background of Rabbi Kook, whose quote about gentile being like cattle is at the top of the page.
Rabbi Kook's entire teaching was based upon the Lurianic Cabbala, the school of Jewish mysticism that dominated Judaism from the late sixteenth to the early nineteenth century. One of the basic tenants of the Lurianic Cabbala is the absolute superiority of the Jewish soul and body over the non-Jewish soul and body. According to the Lurianic Cabbala, the world was created solely for the sake of Jews; the existence of non-Jews was subsidiary.
The same authors later explain the dark dynamics of Kabbalah in great detail (pp 89-90). First, they explain how the subject of how gentiles (or the profane, as occultists would say) are viewed is often intentionally ignored or obfuscated.
The status of non-Jews in the Cabbala as compared to that in Talmudic literature is a good beginning point for discussion. Most of the many Jewish authors that have written about the Cabbala in English, German and French have either avoided this subject or have hidden its essence under clouds of misleading generalizations. These authors, Gershon Scholem being one of the most significant, have employed the trick of using words such as 'men,' 'human beings' and 'cosmic' in order to imply incorrectly that the Cabbala presents a path leading towards salvation for all human beings. The actual fact is that Cabbalistic texts, as opposed to Talmudic literature, emphasize salvation for only Jews.
Then they discuss how books accessible only to Jews or those who know Hebrew are blunt on the matter, illustrating an intentional misrepresentation of Kabbalah to gentiles.
Many books dealing with the Cabbala that are written in Hebrew, other than those written by Scholem, present an honest description of salvation and other sensitive Jewish issues. This point is well illustrated in studies of the latest and most influential school of Cabbala, the Lurianic School, founded in the late sixteenth century and named after its founding rabbi, Yitzhak Luria. The ideas of Rabbi Luria greatly influenced the theology of Rabbi Kook the elder and still underlie the ideologies of Gush Emunim and Hassidism.
Rabbi Hayim Vital wrote in Hebrew (and was later quoted by Kabbalist Yeseiah Tishibi, also only in Hebrew):
Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil, not good, and are created without [divine] knowledge.
Even darker aspects of Kabbalah thought and rationality have surfaced recently when mixed with Zionism. In this quote, a Jewish blooded Kabbalist and Zionist equates Judaism with slaughter, and thinks it a good thing!
The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle)… I don't believe in Western morality. Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention. – Rabbi Manis Friedman, of the Kabbalist-Zionist Chabad Lubavitch sect
But probably the most notorious recent incident involves the publication of the book The King's Torah.
Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, who heads the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the Yitzhar settlement, wrote in his book "The King's Torah" that even babies and children can be killed if they pose a threat to the nation.

Shapiro based the majority of his teachings on passages quoted from the Bible, to which he adds his opinions and beliefs.

'It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation,' he wrote, adding: 'If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder.'

Several prominent rabbis, including Rabbi Yithak Ginzburg and Rabbi Yaakov Yosef, have recommended the book to their students and followers. - West Bank rabbi: Jews can kill Gentiles who threaten Israel.
The point I am making with all of this is that while the Protocols were "plagiarized" (which that, alone, comes with an unusual story that would not be accepted in any other circumstance), it was not an entirely untruthful work just because antisemitism is peppered throughout. Kabbalah is not what many people think it is, and Kabbalah is one of the backbones of Masonry, preceded only by the Egyptian mysteries. The Masonic-Zionist conspiracy is very real and really started moving with the help of the Kabbalist Saul--turned Paul--though that is a separate subject altogether.

The grand world conspiracy is ultimately why things are blatant and in plain site and yet denied and mocked by most people. While some things may be tucked under a rug, with minimal research, everything is out there and for some reason few people care, and for many that do care the blame is unfortunately put on Jewish blood or Judaism as a whole. Let this blog (and Christian Zionists) be a testament that it has nothing to do with being Jewish and everything to do with being an occultist.

The Despicable Hypocrisy of Newt Gingrich


I don't care about Obama, but while Newt Gingrich and his toadies constantly drum up the notion that Obama limits religious freedom and keeps the poor oppressed Christians of America down (because they don't dominate *EVERY FUCKING THING* IN THE GODDAMNED COUNTRY) he supports the burning of someone else's holy book! Not only that, but in stereotypical Islamophobic fashion, he calls the holy book"radical material."

Gingrich: Obama Should Not Apologize for Koran Burning

'They don't deserve an apology': Gingrich Slams Obama for Saying Sorry to Afghans over Koran Burning As Death Toll Rises to 23


If one person so much as talked about burning a Bible he would have a convulsive fit that lasted for days. His complete and utter hypocrisy and indifference to others puts him on the level of Lenin, Stalin and Hitler as I am completely and utterly convinced that if given the chance, he would purge America of the "blood thirsty" Muslims, and throw all the Qur'ans and other Islamic books into large pyres around which people would dance in praise of the "destruction of extremism," and all "sympathizers of radical Islam" would be likewise executed or indefinitely imprisoned.

No one seems to get the clue that this is not just "Islamophobia" comparable to "Homophobia," this is a virulent form of antisemitism, a means for non-Jewish Zionists *especially* (as SOME EARLY ZIONIST JEWS "RESPECTED" ISLAM AND ARABS) to carry out the attitudes of their forefathers but on a new population since after the Holocaust hating Jews became faux pas (rather than taking from it that NO ONE should be hated on any similar basis!).

No one likes Nazi analogies but the man who pointed out that the use of Nazism in an argument or criticism is merely a thought-terminating tactic, specifically stated that they are okay to use when appropriate. In this case, it's the unusual befuddlement people have over how someone like Hitler was able to come to power when NO ONE stops men like Newt Gingrich in their tracks. No one with any kind of authority, influence or power seems to be disturbed about someone running for leader of essentially, the world, who constantly invokes "freedom of religion" while being totally okay with desecrating holy books. Part of the reason why is because liberals often hate Islam just as much as conservatives, if not moreso. Even Muslims hate their own religion as they look for solutions in everything BUT Islam even though they'll constantly give lip service about what's supposed to exist and what Muslims are supposed to believe in (PHARISEES!!!) while they chase after the shiny coins of democracy, monarchy, socialism and other nonsense. In the Bible God says to the Jews for the same exact things: LO AMMI. The Arabic and Islamic equivalent would be LA UMMAH.

But this post is about Newt Gingrich and how hypocritical and devious he is. It's ridiculously obvious so I went off on a rant. All I can say is:
Beware of Normalcy Bias
because right now it seems like everyone is stuck in it (whether it's "things can't get worse" or the ridiculous normalcy of people with power and status hating Islam with intense obsessive virulence), and it's going to bite people in the ass.

Ibn Sayyad and Merkabah Mysticism

"We remained childless for thirty years, then this one-eyed boy was born to us. He is very bad and causes a great deal of trouble."


During the time of the Prophet Muhammad (saaws) there was a strange character by the name of Saf Ibn Sayyad (sometimes spelled Ibn Sa'id). A number of the Prophet's companions, including Umar (ra) swore that Ibn Sayyad was ad-Dajjal (the antichrist) although many scholars past and present have believed that he wasn't. The purpose of this post is not to reveal whether Ibn Sayyad was the Dajjal or not since one can only speculate, but to point out how unusual the traditions were, and to shed a little light on what was actually going on in some respects.

It all began when Ibn Sayyad was just a one-eyed child practicing Merkabah Mysticism in Medinah (between 622-632 AD)

"We saw the boy lying in the sun, covered with a blanket*, murmuring to himself." (Ahmad, Tirmidhi)

"[Muhammad] and Ubayy ibn Ka'b went to the palm grove where Ibn Sayyad was staying. He wanted to hear something from Ibn Sayyad without Ibn Sayyad seeing him. [Muhammad] saw him lying down, covered by a sheet from which was coming a murmuring sound." (Bukhari 1289)

Concerning what Ibn Sayyad was doing, David J. Halperin notes,
"...the description is...reminiscent of the trance- inducing practices of the merkabah mystics. One of the meanings Lane gives for zamzamah is the 'gibberish' spoken by Magians, and other foreigners, when their mouths are full; it seems reasonable that it could be applied to incantations in Hebrew. Further, Ibn Sayyad's unexplained choice of a palm grove for his mystic exercises--which is apparently habitual, since Muhammad can expect to find him there--may be linked to a Jewish mantic practice, referred to in Talmudic and Gaonic sources as "conversation of palm trees" (Sihat d’qalim)" The Ibn Sayyād Traditions and the Legend of al-Dajjāl, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 96, No. 2 (Apr. - Jun., 1976), pp. 213-225
*The actual Arabic is qatifah meaning cloak or outer garment even though it's been translated as blanket and sheet. Before Islam, Arab priests (known in the singular as kahin) would enter into trances while wrapped in a cloak, and likewise mumble.

The merkabah trance argument is further verified by the rest of the first account, which adds that when the men were leaving Ibn Sayyad asked, "What were you doing?" They responded by asking if he had heard them. Ibn Sayyad replied, "Yes. When I sleep my eyes are closed by my mind is still active."

What would seal Ibn Sayyad's notoriety as Dajjal took place when he was nearing puberty and was playing with some children in the hills of Banu Maghala. Umar (ra) and some others were witness to it.

Muhammad: Do you testify that I am the Messenger of Allah?

Ibn Sayyad
: I testify that you are the Messenger of the unlettered. Do you testify that I am the Messenger of Allah?

Muhammad [responded in the negative]: I have believed in Allah and His Messengers. What do you think? [possibly meant: what are you thinking i.e. what's on your mind]

Ibn Sayyad
: Both truthful people and liars come to me.

Muhammad: You are in a state of confusion. I am concealing something from you.

Ibn Sayyad: It is just smoke.

Muhammad
: Shame on you! Do not go too far.

The exchange was enough to permanently affect Umar's opinion of Ibn Sayyad: he was Dajjal in his mind. This is confirmed by Jabir ibn Abdullah (ra), who swore on Allah that Ibn Sayyad was ad-Dajjal and said that it was permissible to swear on Allah that he was because he witnessed Umar (ra) doing the same in front of Muhammad (saaws) without any objection (Sunan Abu Dawud 037.4317). Also, Umar's son, Ibn Umar, is the one who relates quite a few of the Ibn Sayyad ahadith.

In regards to the exchange of words between Muhammad and Ibn Sayyad, Ibn Kathir explains in detail about what Ibn Sayyad meant by the strange statement, "It is just smoke."
"The Messenger of Allah was concealing from him the words, (Then wait you for the Day when the sky will bring forth a visible smoke.)"... "It is Ad-Dukh,'' meaning Ad-Dukhan (the smoke)... There are numerous Marfu` and Mawquf Hadiths, Sahih, Hasan and others, which indicate that the smoke is one of the awaited signs (of the Hour).
There was another strange short conversation between Muhammad and Ibn Sayyad, this time on the roads of Medinah with Abu Bakr (ra) and again Umar (ra) and starting in much the same way as the first.

Muhammad: Do you bear testimony to the fact that I am the Messenger of Allah?

Ibn Sayyad: Do you bear testimony to the fact that I am the Messenger of Allah?

Muhammad
: I affirm my faith in Allah and in His angels, and in His books. And what do you see?

Ibn Sayyad: I see the throne over water.

Muhammad
: You see the throne of Iblis (Satan) upon the water, and what else do you see?

Ibn Sayyad
: I see two truthfuls and a liar or two liars and one truthful.

Muhammad: Leave him. He has been confounded.

Jabir (ra), who is connected to other Ibn Sayyad ahadith, also relates that at a different time Muhammad explained:
The throne of Iblis is upon the ocean and he sends detachments (to different parts) in order to put people to trial and the most important figure in his eyes is one who is most notorious in sowing the seed of dissension. (Sahih Muslim Book 039, Number 6754)
Daniel Merkur, in his work Gnosis: An Esoteric Tradition of Mystical Traditions, Visions and Unions gives his feedback:
He said, 'I see a throne upon the sea (bahr; var., ma', water), around it al-hayyat (var., hayyat).'

The Apostle of God said, 'He sees (yara; var., dhaka, that is) the Throne of the Devil ('arsh Iblis).'

Halperin suggested that the word hayyat 'is to be explained as an Arabicized form of the Hebrew hayyot, ‘living creatures’,' who carry or surround the divine throne in the biblical book of Ezekiel and the merkabah mysticism that contemplates its images. The angelic figures were ordinarily termed 'throne-bearers' (hamalat al-arsh) in Islamic legends; they were termed hayyat only here.” (195)
Years later Ibn Sayyad was on the road to Mecca with Abu Sa'id (ra) when Ibn Sayyad, himself, brings up how others think he is ad-Dajjal

The incident is related in three different ways and in each version Ibn Sayyad leaves Abu Sa'id confused.

"What I have gathered from people is that they think that I am Dajjal. Have you not heard Allah’s Messenger as saying: He will have no children? But I have children. Have you not heard Allah’s Messenger as saying: He would not enter Mecca and Medina? I have been once in Medina and now I intend to go to Mecca. By Allah: I know his place of birth his abode where he is just now."

"I can excuse others; but what has gone wrong with you, O Companions of Muhammad, that you take me as Dajjal? Has Allah’s Apostle not said that he would be a Jew whereas I am a Muslim and he also said that he would not have children, whereas I have children, and he also said: verily, Allah has prohibited him to enter Mecca whereas I have performed Pilgrimage...I know where [Dajjal] is and I know his father and mother. [He was then asked if he would be happy being Dajjal] If this offer is made to me, I would not resent that."

"Did not the Prophet say that the Dajjal would not enter Madinah? I was born there. Did not he say that he would not have any children? - I have children. Did not he say that he would be a Kafir? - I have embraced Islam. Of all the people, I know the most about him: I know where he is now. If I were given the opportunity to be in his place, I would not resent it."

Things get really weird between Ibn Umar (ra) and Ibn Sayyad

In both alleged incidents, Ibn Umar (ra), son of Umar (ra) who insists Ibn Sayyad is ad-Dajjal, goes to Hafsa (wife of Muhammad) and relays the incident(s), at which point she reminds/scolds him because Muhammad (saaws) had said that when ad-Dajjal first "comes out" in public, it would be in a moment of rage (basically, she was saying that Ibn Umar inspired the possible Dajjal's extreme rage, thus ushering him in if he were Dajjal).

In the first incident, it's hard to understand whether or not the hadith is meant to be taken literally or metaphorically (I assume metaphorically).

"...[Ibn Umar] said to him a word which enraged him and he was so much swollen with anger that the way was blocked." (Sahih Muslim 041.7003)

In the second incident (Sahih Muslim 041.7004), Ibn Umar (ra) first talks to some of Ibn Sayyad's friends.

"You state that [Dajjal] was [Ibn Sayyad]...You have not told me the truth; by Allah some of you informed me that he would not die until he would have the largest number of offspring and huge wealth and it is he about whom it is thought so."

They part ways but meet up again and this time Ibn Sayyad's faulty eye is swollen.

Ibn Umar: What has happened to your eye?

Ibn Sayyad: I do not know.

Ibn Umar: This is in your head and you do not know about it?

Ibn Sayyad: If Allah so wills it, He can create [an eye] in your staff.

Ibn Umar (ra) then explains what happened next:

"He then produced a sound like the braying of a donkey. Some of my companions thought that I had struck him with the staff as he was with me when the staff broke into pieces, but, by Allah, I was not conscious of it."

Ibn Sayyad fulfills a Dajjal prophecy

The historian Tabari relates that Ibn Sayyad was part of the Kufan cavalry at the siege of al-Sus. He claims that the Nestorian priests and monks of al-Sus went to the city's walls and taunted the Muslim army, saying that they could only be taken by the antichrist or by those among whom the antichrist was in their midst. It was shortly thereafter that the gates of al-Sus "fly open" at Ibn Sayyad's "kick and command."

Death

Ibn Sayyad is last heard of on August 27, 683, the day of al-Harrah/Battle of al-Harrah. It is uncertain if he was fighting for or against Yazid.

Narrated Jabir ibn Abdullah: We saw the last of Ibn Sayyad at the battle of the Harrah. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 37, Number 4318)

Aftermath

A later discussion between Abu Salamah and Al-Walid ibn Abdullah ibn Jumay (Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37 Number 4314) shows that the debate on whether Ibn Sayyad was Dajjal or not continued between the Sahabah:

Abu Salamah: Jabir testified that [Dajjal] was he who was Ibn Sayyad.

Al-Walid: He died.

Abu Salamah: Let him die.

Al-Walid: He accepted Islam.

Abu Salamah: Let him accept Islam.

Al-Walid: He entered Medinah.

Abu Salamah: Let him enter Medinah.

Ibn Kathir believed:
Ibn Sayyad was a fortune-teller who heard things through the Jinn, whose speech is unclear, therefore he said, 'It is Ad-Dukh,' meaning Ad-Dukhan (the smoke). When the Messenger of Allah was sure what was happening, that the source of his information was the Shayatin, he said: (Be off with you! You cannot get further than your rank.)
After all of this information, it's extremely difficult for anyone to come to a definite conclusion when the Sahabah could not and the Prophet Muhammad (saaws) remained silent on Ibn Sayyad. Some would think that it wouldn't make sense for the Dajjal to be chained in a monastery in one instant (which is considered a strong and valid tradition) and then born to an older Jewish couple the next (which is not considered as strong). Nevertheless, anything is possible. He could have been freed and using his abilities or magic, either allowed himself to become reborn/it was in Allah's will, or his whole childhood was a deep illusion involving jinn. As for the things Dajjal is not supposed to be able to do but Ibn Sayyad did, those could be attributed to the fact that it wasn't the End Times and so the ability to not do those things had not been taken away from him. Nothing is without reason, especially in lieu of other traditions such as the "World King" walking around and visiting Tibetan Monks to predict a war against Muslims, or the mysterious tall man with sunglasses and a Midwestern accent who allegedly is solely responsible for the Georgia Guidestones (overheard on a television show, perhaps Brian Meltzer's Decoded).

One thing that can be agreed on is that, whether or not he was Dajjal, Ibn Sayyad was involved in magic, specifically Kabbalah, and more specifically Merkabah Mysticism, which is its oldest form. That is what Ibn kathir means by "fortune-telling" and working with jinn. A history of practicing Merkabah Mysticism would fit Dajjal nicely since the foundation of most of Western occultism is Kabbalah. But, that information, alone, doesn't prove someone who is one-eyed and says confusing things is necessarily the Dajjal.

Merkabah Mysticism

"I see the throne over water." - Ibn Sayyad

According to Wikipedia:
The Hebrew term merkabah (Hebrew: מֶרְכַּבְ ,מרכבה, and מִרְכֶּבֶת "chariot", derived from the consonantal root r-k-b with general meaning "to ride") is the throne-chariot of God, the four-wheeled vehicle driven by four "hayyot" (Hebrew: "living creatures"), each of which has four wings and the four faces of a man, lion, ox, and eagle. […] The title "hekhalot" [lit. "palaces/temples", hekhalot are written accounts of merkabah experiences] derives from the divine abodes seen by the practitioner following a long period of ritual purification, self-mortification, and ecstatic prayer and meditation. In their visions, these mystics would enter into the celestial realms and journey through the seven stages of mystical ascent: the Seven Heavens and seven throne rooms. Such a journey is fraught with great danger, and the adept must not only have made elaborate purification preparation, but must also know the proper incantations, seals and angelic names needed to get past the fierce angelic guards, as well as know how to navigate the various forces at work inside and outside the palaces.
The website Merkabah Mysticism and Neo-Sabbatian Kabbalah states that: Merkabah, the contemplation of the Divine Chariot seen by Ezekiel in his vision of God (Ez 1:4), is possibly the oldest-known and most-powerful form of Jewish mysticism.

An example of the "conversation of palm trees" in Merkabah Mysticism (i.e. why Ibn Sayyad would be trancing out around palm trees), based on a documented example from the same site: At once the trees opened in song: 'Then shall all the trees sing before the Lord' (Pa 96:13).

The website goes on to explain that merely contemplating the merkabah (throne) has numerous mystical and supernatural benefits involving the Unseen, such as what Ibn Sayyad was able to demonstrate:
The greatest of his rewards is that it brings him into the celestial chambers and places him before the divine throne and he becomes knowledgable of all future events in the world: who will be thrust down and who will be raised up, who will be weakened and who will be strengthened, who will be impoverished and who will be made affluent, on whom will be decreed death and on whom life, from whom will be taken away an inheritance and to whom will be given an inheritance, who will be endowed with Torah and who with wisdom.

Greater than this is that he becomes knowledgeable of human behavior. If a person commits adultery he knows it; if a person commits murder he knows it; if he is suspected of having relations with a woman during her menstrual period, he knows it. Greater than these is the fact that he becomes a savant in the arts of magic.
Without a doubt the evidence shows that Ibn Sayyad was a practitioner of Merkabah Mysticism in the least during his youth, supported by the less-specific opinion of Ibn Kathir. In addition, Umar (ra), Ibn Umar (ra), Jabir (ra), Abu Salamah (ra) and possibly Hafsa (ra) believed he that he was also ad-Dajjal. It was likewise permissible to swear to Allah (say wallahi) that Ibn Sayyad was Dajjal.

Seth in Japan, Japanese Children of Seth

In Abrahamic traditions, Seth the prophet is the forefather of all humankind. However, this is interesting because the mythology of Susa-no-o (須佐之男) is rather similar to the mythology of Set/Seth of Egypt and the occult. Also, before the Masonic president (and thus Horus-worshiping president) dropped the atomic bombs on innocent Japanese civilians for having the audacity to hold onto an ideology and spirit that did not allow surrender, the Japanese considered themselves descended from the gods (Emperor: Amaterasu, the population Susa-no-o et al. kami). The way the Japanese were treated and fear-mongered and forced to renounce their national spirit is much in the same way the West has been handling Islam. Japan lost the emperor and the Muslim Ummah lost the khilafah (Islamic State). There is even a little known history between the Islamic world and imperial Japan because of such similarities. The Ummah had already lost its political power symbol (khilafah) at that time, and Japan (in big brother, little brother fashion) offered to bring it back.

"On his part, Susa-no-wo decided to leave the residence of the gods and just like many other divine heroes who lived on earth, he became a monster-slayer. One day he saw a huge dragon about to devour a young maid. He came to her rescue right away and killed the dragon. He eventually married her and became the forefather of several large Japanese noble families. Knowing that the dragon had a sword inside his stomach, Susa-no-wo cut it open and claimed it for himself."*

*Savitri Devi, "Shinto -- La via degli dei," Arya, no. 4 (July 1980). Trans. Guido Stucco. Savitri Devi's essay "Shinto -- The Way of the Gods" was written in English in New Delhi in 1979. It was then translated into Italian by Vittorio De Cecco for the Italian-language NS periodical Arya, published in Montreal. The English original of the essay is lost; the text above is Guido Stucco's translation of a translation. Portions of Savitri's "Shinto" may have first appeared in Asit Krishna Mukherji's Eastern Economist, which was published in collaboration with the Japanese from 1938-1941. (Source)

"The rival Izumo clan is descended from Susanoo, and so it can be seen as part of the divine plan that they should have a subordinate role." (Source)

Rudra Chakrin: King of the World, Tantric Apocolyptic Redeemer, and Dajjal

GUEST POST: Isma'il adh-Dhahiri

'Behold [Dajjal] is in the Syrian sea, or the Yemeni sea. Nay, on the contrary he is in the East, he is in the East, he is in the East,' and he pointed with his hand towards the East.
(Sahih Muslim, Book #041, Hadith #7028)
We hurriedly went on till we came to [a] monastery and found a well-built person there with his hands tied to his neck and having iron shackles between his two legs up to the ankles. We said: Woe be upon thee, who are you? And he said:...I am going to tell you about myself. I am Dajjal and would be soon permitted to get out... (ibid)
In 1921, Polish explorer Ferdynand Ossendowski published Beasts, Men, and Gods, an account of his travels in the Far East during the time of the Russian Revolution. In section V of the work (Chapters 46-49), Ossendowski recounts how, after a strange presence was felt in a Tibetan valley which disturbed his guides and upset their animals, he was told the legends of the "Brahytma", the World-King of Tibetan Buddhism.
More than sixty thousand years ago a Holyman disappeared with a whole tribe of people under the ground and never appeared again on the surface of the earth. (pg. 302)
This kingdom, the lama goes on to explain, was visited by many saints and mystics, including the Sakyamuni Buddha (the historical founder of Buddhism). Its location is obscure, but the kingdom is known to be a veritable heaven on earth, and ruled by an all-powerful man:
All the people there are protected against Evil and crimes do not exist within its bournes. Science has there developed calmly and nothing is threatened with destruction. The subterranean people have reached the highest knowledge. Now it is a large kingdom, millions of men with the King of the World as their ruler. He knows all the forces of the world and reads all the souls of humankind and the great book of their destiny. Invisibly he rules eight hundred million men on the surface of the earth and they will accomplish his every order. (ibid)
Another Lama added further detail on the World-King, telling him that the king and his companions have the powers “of the earth, of inferno and of the sky and […] can do everything for the life and death of man”, and that "by his order trees, grasses and bushes can be made to grow; old and feeble men can become young and stalwart; and the dead can be resurrected." (pg 304).

In short, the Brahytma is seen as a living God who rules over a perfect, paradisiacal kingdom called either Agharti or Shambhala.

Shortly before finishing his book, Ossendowski was told by a high ranking Lama that the King of the World had appeared before the monks of his monastery in 1891 and given them a dire "prophecy". Mostly, it was a generic doomsday warning, but one part referred specifically to Muslims:
The 'Crescent' will grow dim and its followers will descend into beggary and ceaseless war. Its conquerors will be stricken by the sun but will not progress upward and twice they will be visited with the heaviest misfortune, which will end in insult before the eye of the other peoples. (pg. 313)
The prediction ended with the words "...Then the peoples of Agharti will come up from their subterranean caverns to the surface of the earth." (pg. 314)

Prophecies about the emergence of the people of the subterranean kingdom, along with their all-powerful king, are an integral part of Tibetan Buddhist eschatology. The Kalachakra Tantra, a central scripture of Tibetan Buddhism, prophesies that in the last age, the last King of Shambhala/Agharti, Rudra Chakrin ("wrathful wheel turner"), also known as Rigden Djapo, will emerge from his kingdom to slay the wicked, conquer the earth, and make the true doctrine reign supreme over all. The sixth Panchen Lama described this scenario in the following prayer to Rudra Chakrin:
Thee, great lama, who lives in this paradise land and who is constantly in prayer, shall adopt the title of Rigden Djapo and shall defeat the armies of lalo. Thy army shall include people of many nations. Thee shall have 40,000 large wild elephants, four millions of mad elephants, many warriors, and Thee shall pierce the heart of the king of lalo... Thy people shall tame the lalo's protectors, and the lalo's influence shall be totally gone. And then the time shall come when the true faith spreads all over.” (Red Shambhala, pg. 5)
The "lalo" being referred to in these prophecies are described in Tibetan Buddhist texts as a group of "barbarians" that Rudra Chakrin will destroy, along with their "false doctrines". "Lalo" is a Tibetan equivalent of the Sanskrit term "mleccha", and is used to refer to all people of non-Dharmic faiths. It is used, more specifically, in the Kalachakra Tantra to refer to the followers of "Adam, Noah, Abraham, and five others – Moses, Jesus, the White-Clad One, Muhammad, and Mahdi [...]" (Verse I.154, The Abridged Kalachakra Tantra). They are said to have been the propagators of the false dharma (path, religion) of the mlecchas. The message they brought is referred to as "tamas" (literally "darkness", but it is used more specifically in Buddhism to refer to teachings which are utter falsehood).

The Shambhala/Agharti myth with its vision of an occult rulership of the world and terrifying apocalyptic narrative, has fascinated Western mystics since the nineteenth century and figures prominently in the thought of the Theosophical Society, the Russian painter and explorer Nicholas Roerich, the French “Synarchist” Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre, and the Traditionalist/Sufi philosopher Rene Guenon.

In his book Lord of the World, Guenon implicitly identifies the Brahytma with the “Qutb” (axial saint, pole of the age) of Sufism (pg. 19), and puts forth the idea, common in nineteenth and early twentieth century occultism, of Shambhala/Agharti as the true center of all initiatic tradition, with the hidden King of the World as the head of the “highest circle” of the “initiatic hierarchy” (pg. 23). This “highest circle” corresponds to the “secret chiefs” of much of Western occultism (especially prominent in the teachings of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn), the “Mahatmas” of Theosophy, and the Aqtab of Sufism.

Naturally, many people (especially Muslims, Christians, and Jews) will be disturbed that Tibetan Buddhism envisions an apocalyptic scenario in which all forms of monotheism are violently destroyed, and that said destruction is seen as the key to universal peace and tranquility. This is made especially disturbing for Muslims by the way that many of the descriptions of the King of the World resemble the statements related from the Prophet Muhammad (May God bless him and grant him peace) about the coming of al-Masih ad-Dajjal (the False Messiah/Antichrist).

In brief, the Dajjal is a false savior who presents himself as the true and living God, comes as a figure of world peace and unification, but perpetrates brutal war against the true believers. His reign culminates in the second coming of Jesus (peace be upon him), who slays the Dajjal and establishes a true era of peace and Godliness. The Brahytma’s earthly paradise, Shambhala, and his powers over the inferno remind one of the following statement of the Prophet (PBUH):
He (Dajjal) will have a paradise and a hell with him, but his paradise will be a hell and his hell will be a paradise. (Sahih Muslim, no. 5222)
Like Brahytma, the Dajjal shows strange powers over the earth and can appear wherever he pleases:
Under the feet of the Dajjal the earth will be rolled up as the skin of the ram is rolled up from wool. (Hakim al-Nishaburi, Al-Mustadrak alaa al-Sahihain, 4; 529-530)
The expression “rolling up the earth” (tayy al-ard) is used in Arabic to refer to a sort of travel (similar to teleportation) where, rather than moving to a destination, the destination moves to you.

The lama’s statements about Brahytma’s powers over the sky and vegetation call to mind this statement about Dajjal:
Then he will command the sky to rain, and the earth to bring forth vegetation, and their cattle will come back to them in the evening, with their humps very high, and their udders full of milk, and their flanks stretched. – (Sahih Muslim, 5228)
The Dajjal also possesses the apparent power over life and death ascribed to the King of the World:
Part of his fitnah will be that he will say to a Bedouin, 'Do you think that if I resurrect your father and mother for you that you will testify that I am your lord?’ He will say, ‘Yes.’ So two devils will appear to him in the image of his father and mother, saying, ‘O my son, follow him for he is your lord.’ (Sunan Ibn Majah, no. 4067)
The deification which the Brahytma receives from Tibetan Buddhism and occult groups parallels the deification the Dajjal will receive when he presents himself to the world as king. The powers he is ascribed in Tibetan legend parallel those of the Dajjal in near-exact detail, and the world conquest and mass-slaughter of Muslims by Rudra Chakrin, Brahytma’s final incarnation, seem to put the resemblance beyond mere coincidence. The Brahytma’s place in western occultism as the supreme God and central figure of all initiation connect him with the Egyptian deity Horus, who, as other posts on this blog have shown, also possesses a strong identification with the Dajjal. Taken together, all these factors make it easy to conclude that the Brahytma/Rudra Chakrin is the Dajjal of Islamic eschatology.

The Suicide Cult of Lady Gaga Redemptrix

There is a phenomenon occurring in America that many people know about, but surprisingly no one has commented on despite its disturbing nature and creepy correlations: Homosexual boys are killing themselves and they're dedicating their suicides to Lady Gaga while claiming that Lady Gaga had saved them.

While celebrities are not responsible for the actions of their fans, this has to be brought to attention because no one, absolutely no one, is saying don't fucking kill yourself. Instead, a suicide trip in Lady Gaga's name will bring you immortality and apotheosis vis-a-vis the Redemptrix herself and all of her "little monsters." It's so strange and disturbing that it seems to be part of a larger public mystery cult rather than simply the consequences of a ditsy celebrity not knowing how to address people with a penchant for copycat suicide (choosing to focus on bullying rather than her own indirect influence). Meanwhile, the drugged-up, addled populace with its desire for bandaid emotion-driven feel good solutions jumps on the bullying bandwagon and on a much larger scale contributes to the martyrization of such children rather than focus on making children get suicide out of their head, which would include other children with higher suicide rates who don't kill themselves because of bullying or LGBT issues (such as American Indian children across nations and tribes).

Most people can agree that bullying is not only wrong, but can be highly damaging to a person. The problem is that, in typical Western fashion, instead of addressing bullying at its root, false solutions are sought like criminalization and putting all of the blame on the bullies rather than the person who made the decision. Everyone forgets that suicide is a form of murder.

While making laws against bullying feels good and seems right, how could it ever be implemented without dragging innocent people down with it? Nevermind that it doesn't directly address suicide. A person who would kill themselves because of bullying would kill themselves for another reason if necessary because there's no value system in place to tell them that suicide is never the answer. Also, Lady Gaga doesn't really seem to have a problem with bullies anyway. The grandest bullies of all are American politicians. She has no problem serenading them one-on-one, nor does she have any problem with encouraging people to join the military to physically bully, rape and kill innocent civilians.

What we have with Lady Gaga is a woman who utilizes intense and extreme occult imagery and symbolism into every single thing that she does, while being accessible to her fans, bringing her fans into her and into the world of manipulation, obfuscation, and power. It should be of no surprise, then, that when she takes up causes the problems only amplify when her name is invoked, not diminish.

Art is magic, especially music. When one thinks of what's involved in making music, one can realize that music is a form of alchemy, in a sense. Some of the most beloved initiates were composers and musicians, Mozart being an easy example. Like those before her, Lady Gaga invokes Horus in almost every performance, and as a result becomes Isis--the mother goddess--for her fans. She's a Magna Mater, a "Fame Monster Mother" to her "Little Monster" worshipers. In our secular world that no longer has functional, powerful monarchs, she--in celebrity fashion--has filled in the subconscious cultural need for the sacred queen mother--the Isis, the Cybele, the virgin and mother, the female and male, the Mary who can save you. That is why these children thank her before they kill themselves. Like the goddess consort Attis, in death, she redeems them. Through her and in death do they find comfort and release from the prison of the world. For them, the queen, the goddess, the redemptrix sings.

Why is there such fighting within the monster family? Isn’t the point that we are connected because of our humanity and the freedom we’ve found in Gaga?” – A Little Monster


"Don't forget me when I come crying to heaven's door," wrote Jamey Rodemeyer on his Facebook page while posting lyrics from her song "The Queen."

"Thank you so much Lady Gaga, for being the fearless, relentless, proud LGBTQ advocate the world needs. You make me so proud. You are my biggest inspiration. Continue to light the fire that illuminates the darkness in so many lives." - EricJames Borges

It Gets Better, I promise!
- Jamey Rodemeyer

"Hold your head up and you'll go far. Because that's all you have to do, just love yourself and you're set."- Jamey Rodemeyer

Lady Gaga makes a tribute, redeems Jamey Rodemeyer by saying that suicides go to heaven, and that he's "not a victim." He's buried in a Lady Gaga t-shirt with a unicorn on it (traditionally a symbol of Jesus Christ connected to Mary's intercession on his behalf). "He was so much for her message...she was the biggest influence in his life."

@ladygaga bye mother monster, thank you for all you have done, paws up forever

Over 22 Million Drug Users in America (not counting legal perscription drug use)

Anyone who has watched the show Intervention is probably already familiar with the 2010 statistic that states that over 22 million people in America are addicts since that forms the introduction of the show. I don't mean to be repetitive with information that's already out there, but I think it's important for people to dwell on it and really take it in.

I would wager that the statistics are actually lower than the reality. From my own experiences, it really seems like that there is no way that only 9% of the population uses or has used drugs. Almost every single person I have ever met in my life has used drugs sometime in their life, or is actively using drugs. Many of them were or are very heavy users, too.

I'm bringing this up because of what it means for society and the world. I sometimes feel like that I had been the only one who ever learned that drugs (and alcohol) permanently affect your brain, and that there is no healing of it. When you Google that, however, you'll be flooded with a ton of articles that not only say alcohol doesn't kill brain cells, but that alcohol actually HELPS your brain, and that various drugs are good for you (yay for the internet where you can find an article or study that "proves" anything). This is completely asinine and very likely propaganda put out by those who would benefit. All the heavy drug and/or alcohol users I have ever met have noticeable and severe cognitive impairment particularly in certain areas relating to societal and peer pressure/following of the status quo, and personal beliefs. What I mean is, whatever is the path of least resistance and general superficial popularity, that is what the majority of them follow. Some examples include espousing agnostic beliefs (historically unprecedented at such levels) and extreme liberal opinions that don't make much sense, but are nevertheless parroted as the mark of progressiveness and intellectualism i.e. "legalizing marijuana will make drug use go down and stop Mexican drug lords beheading everyone even though their money is in the hard drugs." I'm not picking on liberals, the other side is extreme bigoted and highly simplistic beliefs based on heresay or flat out lies that are nevertheless published and accepted as truth when any basic research would prove otherwise. Both liberal and conservative drug users essentially believe what they read--question very little. Those are just some examples.

Drugs are not entirely to blame for the beliefs, attitudes and decisions (as in, they don't come out of nowhere as a result of drug use), but I believe the addled states of mind make people more prone to the power of suggestion and thus controlled and easy to control in other situations.

Intellectuals have bemoaned the weak mentality of the masses since the beginning, but it needs to be seriously understood that when a significant amount of the population is not in a natural state of mind--is controlled or guided by a substance--the ramifications are disturbing to think about. It's like being the sole sane and clear-minded person in the world, and you're the one in a mental hospital.

Alien Deception


And on the Day when He will gather them (all) together (and say): "O you assembly of jinn! Many did you mislead of men..."
Qur'an 6:128

With the History Channel spewing out the garbage of Erich von Däniken and his apostles at record pace to make a buck and to whip everyone up into an imaginative frenzy, the truth must be told about so-called extraterrestrials. One of the best non-Muslim sources for this is John Keel.

Removing the bias of belief from his investigations, Keel documented numerous incidents in his book The Mothman Prophecies without the presupposition of what the incidents were i.e. alien encounters. As a result, he not only was able to present a clearer and stranger picture of what was going on, but he was able to reach some conclusions that, in the mainstream realm, were atypical.
Human beings are generally considered the superior intelligence and dominant life-form on Earth. Since UFOs appear to involve a differ­ent, seemingly greater, intelligence, it has been widely speculated that they come from another planet using advanced techno­logy. The Ultraterrestrial concept proposes instead that there is a more advanced intelli­gence co-existing on Earth but beyond our normal perception, just as an ant might only be vaguely aware of humans as an intimidating or overpowering presence, and whose true nature is beyond their comprehension. Source
Interestingly enough, nothing of what he said contradicted what Islam had always asserted about the supernatural. Namely, that there are other creatures of high intelligence that exist (and Islam explains have existed before us) who are different from us, but similar in the mundane aspects of life. They share the earth with us in ways we don't fully understand, and often interact with us, especially in the realm of deception.

One mundane example of Keel's documentations and Islam's assertions is as follows:

Keel
In earlier times, fairies, demons, and even human witches practicing their Black Sabbath rites, chose gravel pits, garbage dumps, cemeteries and crossroads for their appearances. Modern hairy monsters and UFOs select the same sites, and quite a few UFO contacts have occurred near crossroads or on highways still under construction at points where old highways once intersected. Derenberger's first contact with Cold was on a newly completed highway yards from an old intersection. - The Mothman Prophecies, 103
Islam
The jinn live where we don't live on this earth. They are mostly to be found in ruins and unclean places like bathrooms, dunghills, garbage dumps and graveyards. Hence the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) taught us to take precautions when entering such places, by reciting the adhkar (mentioning Allah’s Name) prescribed by Islam. - Shaykh Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid
It has been drilled into people's minds that only aliens from space could have civilizations and cultures and families and high technology most likely because it's easier to imagine than, say, alternate complex dimensions that coexist with ours.
Three thousand years ago a small group of brilliant men investigated and solved the mystery of unidentified flying objects. Since then a great many others have approached the same mystery from different perspectives and solved it over and over again. Unfortunately, their staggering solutions were obfuscated by intellectual extrapolations and the ponderous terminology of philosophy and theology. Few modern UFO enthusiasts have the educational background to understand such literature. They choose, as an alternative, to deal with the phenomenon on a materialistic level, assuming that the presence of unlikely objects and entities in our atmosphere is evidence of some extraterrestrial civilization. - The Mothman Prophecies, 28
What's most important to know, however, is that for a number of reasons, including their own cultural-religious beliefs (that being Islam's standpoint, not Keel's), these beings can be master deceivers. While we are stuck in one plane of existence and are entirely material they are not, and can be fluid in their appearance even though they live generic lives like us. As a result they can easily appear to a human and claim to be anything from an angel to an alien from outer space, and the average person, lacking the proper knowledge, would be inclined to believe them on the mere fact that the situation was out of the ordinary and so must be as advertised.
To the regret of the true believers, the majority of the witnesses to chimerical events were alone at the time of their experience. While the amateur investigators tend to concentrate on the very subjective descriptions of the observers, I probed deeper and studied the witnesses themselves. Many, I found, suffered certain medical symptoms such as temporary amnesia, severe headaches, muscular spasms, excessive thirst and other effects, all of which have been observed throughout history in religious miracles (the appearances of religious apparitions), demonology, occult phenomena, and contacts with fairies. All of these manifestations clearly share a common source or cause. While chimeras can come in all sizes and shapes, ranging from twenty-foot giants to animated tin cans only a few inches in height, the most fascinating type is one who has appeared in almost every country on earth. In other ages he was regarded as the devil incarnate. He dressed in black and rode a black horse. Later he arrived in black horsedrawn carriages, even in hearses. Today he steps out of flying saucers in remote farm fields. He is built exactly like us, stands from five feet six inches to six feet tall, looks very human but has high cheekbones, unusually long fingers, and an Oriental cast to his features. His complexion is olive or reddish. He speaks every language, sometimes mechanically as if he is reciting a memorized speech, sometimes fluently. He has trouble breathing, often wheezing and gasping between words. Like our dinosaurs and hairy bipeds, he often leaves a few footprints behind ... footprints which suddenly end as if he had vanished into thin air. - The Mothman Prophecies, 29
In Islam the beings are collectively referred to as jinn. When non-Muslims hear of that they think of genie (root word being jinni, masculine singular of jinn) and put them in a cultural Orientalist box of limited demographics and limited abilities. That is not an accurate portrayal, however, as jinn includes everything from the hairy bipeds, snake people, fairies (peris), flying creatures, demons, spirits and ghosts to the so-called aliens. I find it unfortunate that many people are ignorant of this information, and continue to rely on guessing games. Even when just categorizing the supernatural, jinn are either almost always left out or are described as merely an Arab cultural phenomenon (either as jinn or genies). It's so ridiculous that it's almost as if there's a conspiracy to keep such knowledge from the past repressed.
...as more and more people believe in flying saucers from other planets, the lower force can manipulate more people through false illumination. I have been watching, with great consternation, the worldwide spread of the UFO believe and its accompanying disease. If it continues unchecked we may face a time when universal acceptance of the fictitious space people will lead us to a modern faith in extraterrestrials that will enable them to interfere very overtly in our affairs... - The Mothman Prophecies, 109

Project Monarch or Borderline Personality Disorder?

Many, many celebrities exhibit the symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder, although if diagnosed with a psychiatric condition, are diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder, a similar but also very different condition. For some reason, perhaps because of the stigma attached to the diagnosis, very, very few celebrities are diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder despite the fact that it's not uncommon for it to be thrown out as a diagnosis for an average person exhibiting the same behaviors. As a result, those who have no contact or experience with "BPD" (short for Borderline Personality Disorder and not Bipolar Disorder, which is BD), come to unusual conclusions about the symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder when manifested in celebrities.

The entertainment industry with its wonderful ability to destroy souls and preoccupy everyone with wordily things that have little spiritual benefit practically guarantees Borderline Personality Disorder, especially in the acting realm where people have to live as others over and over (as in don't act, be). Additionally, many troubled people seek fame out to fill that emptiness that plagues people with BPD, and some are successful. With their money and condition, they are able to engage in self-destructive behaviors that are par for the BPD course.

There are numerous links on celebrities and Borderline Personality Disorder. Here are a few:
So what does this have to do with Project Monarch? This has to do with Project Monarch because it's a conspiracy theory that tends to see individuals who are probably "BPD" as victims of a global conspiracy where all of the things they go through and do is intentionally done in order to program the public into changing their values and priorities (among other things).

For more information on what people believe Project Monarch to be, check out these links:
Not a single person who discusses Project Monarch ever brings up Borderline Personality Disorder. Rather, they conceive of the symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder that are manifested in celebrities as proof of an arduous and lengthy process of abuse and conditioning that results in alter egos and manifestations of evil agendas. It is not realized that minor abuse in childhood, or even the complete absence of abuse, produces all of the actions of the celebrity "slaves" that are supposed to be part of the conspiracy, including the emergence of alternate personae. All that's really required for a person to manifest these things is BPD with or without a history of mental or physical abuse.


I'm sure there are people out there who aren't going to believe me and think I've been "programed" to spread disinfo about Project Monarch. Others might assert that Project Monarch conspiracy and Borderline Personality Disorder are not mutually exclusive. My stance is that the conspiracy came about due to a lack of understanding regarding the existence of Borderline Personality Disorder and its symptoms (and people selling lies, or because MK-ULTRA was real so everything else must be too etc.). Other non-BPD aspects of the conspiracy like Alice in Wonderland symbolism, sex kitten motifs, to me, are just dot connecting and complete and utter distraction and possible disinformation from real and substantial conspiracies.