Conflicting Conspiracies and Junk Speculations Made Fact

One of the number one complaints about conspiracy theories and/or theorists is that the information is conflicting and often contradictory.

That alone can easily be explained by the very fact that theorizing conspiracies is not limited to a single segment of the population or followers of a certain encompassing ideology. Basically, people will come to their own conclusions based on their experiences and belief systems. For Protestant conspiracy theorists, for instance, Queen Elizabeth was a victim of the Catholic church. For other conspiracy theorists, she was just another corrupt ruler--victim to no one but herself. That's a rather mundane example. A more extreme example is in the discussion of bloodlines. Some people believe that some bloodlines have been existence since the beginning of time and they are the ones from whom the various evil personages emerge. Some say they are Babylonian, others Jewish/Khazar and still others not even human but Reptilian.

Unfortunately, in order to compensate for these conflicting beliefs and theories people immediately assume that the other party/theory/perspective is naturally disinformation/a disinformation agent or alternately works for the CIA or some other intelligence organization. Granted, disinformation is real, and has been spoken about as a necessary tool to keep "conspiracy theorists" in check. I'm not mocking that fact. However, I am mocking the knee-jerk reaction to anything that's floating around that seems wacky or is just different than one's own perspective.

A lot of conspiracy theorizing is connecting the dots. That is how anyone can become a conspiracy theorist. What separates the amateurs from the professionals, generally, is the use of evidence to build and support an argument. Evidence, in this case, is something concrete and definite, such as an official contradicting a story, video footage etc. and not just dot-connecting because things may appear to reflect something [for the record I place myself in the amateur category because for most things in the conspiracy realm, I can only state what I believe appears to be the case]. The other thing, though, that means success or failure is the ability to appeal to a broad audience. Sometimes, this includes audience manipulation via flashy videos with little information or just books that are packed with stuff that sounds good or different--it can even be packed with "content." These last mediums in those uses should be discouraged and not supported. After all, isn't it the "Illuminati agenda" to fluff things up so that emotions are pulled to attract or repel you to or from something, and books are written that may seem good but are actually quite lacking in substantial argument and proof?

One of the other predominate complaints about conspiracy theories and/or theorists is that everything is taken to be a conspiracy with varying degrees of who is in on it. One of the most blatant examples of this that continues to this day is the blaming of HAARP for every single weather anomaly (or phenomenon) or natural disaster. It doesn't matter that no one can specifically narrow down what HAARP can actually do--that only gives fodder for HAARP being responsible for every major natural event. The generic suspicion about HAARP is justified, and it probably does involve some kind of weather control. It just gets odd when every thing becomes the result of HAARP. That is what, unfortunately, shuts people out to any mention of HAARP altogether. Some people don't realize that natural disasters have always occurred, and that some events are just weird and unexplainable. These used to be known (and I guess are still known) as Fortean events (also collectively and categorically known as Forteana). Weird things have been seen in the sky and weird things including goop, colors, blood, animals etc. have rained from the sky since, it seems, recorded time.

What also needs to be taken into account too is the very real fact that there are mentally ill people. Conspiracy theories, New Age stuff and the paranormal tends to attract them a great deal. What's more is that extreme paranoia is a subcategory/type of schizophrenia and usually these delusions involve government agents and spying and chip implants and the like. There are common delusions, oddly enough. For instance, it is very common to hear a paranoid schizophrenic explain that something is inside their television recording them or watching them somehow. One symptom of generic schizophrenia is obsessive writing. Conspiracy theorizing and publishing fits that lifestyle well. Mental illness of this nature is rarely subtle, though. It can generally be discerned when someone is just misguided or strongly believes in something and when someone is delusional. But if one doesn't come in contact with the person it can be masked in their productions or writings, to a degree. Unfortunately, mental illness is what is used to label conspiracy theorists the most, namely with the quip of time to put on my tinfoil hat. It's just a thought-terminating cliche used to silence an individual and to crush any chance of his making a point.

So, why am I even making this post? What's the point? The point is to hopefully get more people aware of what they are viewing and accepting as fact or "good information." It's too often that I have seen people spread around stuff that is contradictory, or speculate on something that has no substantial argument. There is also a trend in believing people who claim to be ex-Illuminati or former Freemasons or the victims of government mind control and the like. I would argue that what any such types say should be taken with a grain of salt. Like, how many apostate 33 degree Masons are there? Why is it so common to quit after having gone that far? I've even heard of higher degrees! Likewise, in the past I have read a debate concerning whether or not some guy had actually been a Manchurian supersoldier in the past, someone that was clearly lying and concocting fiction for the purposes of money-making (or was merely delusional) yet people couldn't decide this for themselves despite the fact that this super smart, super strong guy refused to demonstrate any of his abilities.

I just hope, if anything, I can instill a healthy sense of skepticism so that information can be better filtered to weed out the "junk" theories that are floating around (yes, in the end it's all subjective...the unfortunate rub).

Zombies and Ghosts, Oh My!

It's borderline annoying how overused things in the media get. If something turns out to be successful there always has to be a knock-off. This is especially prevalent in the mainstream horror genre where it's hard to find something that is truly original either in concept or execution. I believe that some of these overused subject matter have some subconscious significance that underlie the various known symbolic associations of, in particular, the use of zombies and ghosts. As usual, I am discussing this from an Islamic perspective. However, I believe there is much overlapping.

Let's look at zombies, for instance. They're always popular, and it extends beyond the film industry. Thousands of people participate in organized zombie walks, which is essentially zombie roleplay out in public. While I know there are a number of reasons people think zombies are cool, or that just doing something like that is fun, there seems to be something deeply subconscious about the desire to be an ambulatory corpse. Take for instance subconscious knowledge concerning the Resurrection. Zombies always look the way they did when they died, they generally crowd together, they generally moan or some other thing and generally want to take others down by consuming them/are driven by base desires--namely the act of consuming. While the latter can represent a return to a "natural" state, the other aspects fit the imagery. Namely, being raised as how one died (or before one died) amidst a large populace, moaning from helplessness, and having no friends to help one another and desiring to bring others down too, at least until rendered naked and sweating with faces darkened or lightened and all that. It's especially fitting given that the people that indulge in that sort of thing generally have the most to worry about concerning the Hereafter...and it's common for such serious ideas and events to be mocked in one form or another.

When it comes to the issue of ghosts, things get more complicated. While zombies can be tools used to represent a variety of things on the surface, ghosts have a more defined purpose that is is completely overlooked in society, mostly because of their popularity, the things they suggest, and the numerous amount of first-hand experiences and sightings. People that have a set belief in the Hereafter know better about ghosts regardless of what they personally experience. Death may not be the end, but the dead stay dead. It's like George Carlin once mocked, people, for some reason or another, believe that the dead have nothing better to do than to concern themselves with the people that are still living. Not only that, but they only seem to come from the upper echelons of society and only certain time periods. I mean, there is so much that could be discussed about ghosts from an Islamic perspective. We know that both angels and jinn can shapeshift, that jinn are the world's tricksters and that the devils among them are the devils that are popularized in culture. So, why would jinn appear as dead people? What could possibly be the motive?

Aside from boredom, attachment to a human being, or the ease of which to convey an important message, there is a more devious reason, namely misguidance and disbelief. People often say that because of ghosts they believe there's "something more" when we die. Rarely can they say what, but if they do it's usually a New Age concept or some pseudo-Christianity. Also, for some it establishes the idea that no one goes to Hell, or that Hell is only for serial killers. Basically, just "go to the light" and everything will be alright. No mention of the angel's role in carrying the soul or anything or that you will be held accountable for what you do in life (meaning as long as you don't kill anyone or something similar, you're going to Heaven). It continues further...

In Islam, we have a tradition about the antichrist (Dajjal). Namely, that one of the ways he will win people over is that in their time of need, when they have lost a loved one, he will have a jinni transform itself to look like the deceased so that he can claim to have resurrected the individual and also to get the deceased to encourage the living to follow and support him. The concept is very simple. It's even been used in movies and television shows where an illusion of a dead person is used to manipulate the emotions of someone who's vulnerable. It should be noted that the one-eyed god of Freemasonry, the Horus, the Dajjal, is considered by them to be a resurrector. That is one of his epithets and praises according to former Masons especially those who turned to Christianity (because of its mockery of the miracles of Jesus (as)). It should be of no surprise, then, to see the Eye of Horus pop up as a symbol of paranormal groups such as the one above and one of the more popular ones, the Paranormal Research Society, whose imagery is even more disturbing as the Eye of Horus is a aflame and being cradled by a pair of hands.

One clear sign of the ghost fraud involves psychics. Anyone that has delved deep into the cult knows well about jinn, regardless of what they call them i.e. spirits being the most common reference (they often put jinn into a separate category but that is not accurate, jinn is a catch-all term). In Islam, we know that so-called psychics work by having a jinni companion who whispers who mixes some truth in a lot of falsehood. The use of a guide is something that is readily admitted by psychics and it goes further, which should be a flashing red light to anyone absorbed with ghosts. Psychics need a "spirit guide" that is "not dead" to help them communicate with the dead. This is admitted and not conspiracy--this is what some of the most famous psychics that aren't completely making things up have explained and is also what I had personally dealt with when I worked with all of this (mine called himself Daniel). Even on the show Psychic Kids, one girl is shown hers, who is named something like John. It doesn't make sense that if ghosts are just everywhere, imparting messages to people or tormenting them, or acting like tricksters for no good reason, why there needs to be some completely non-human intermediary that whispers the things to you and helps you to sense things and all that. Granted, not everything paranormal is attributed to dead people...sometimes they concede that they are dealing with "entities" and other things. This of course fits with Islam because we know jinn live their own lives and often it clashes with ours. It's not always in the form of the ghost fitnah (tribulation). A lot of "shadow people" phenomenon gets attributed to ghosts without further support, for instance. At any rate, I'm stressing the current cultural obsession with ghosts because it could be mentally paving the way for what is to come i.e. if you accept the possibility of ghosts now, it will be rather easy for the Dajjal to use it to deceive you into following him, something that has been warned about well before the modern mythology of ghosts and the other revelations from ghost hunting.

Osiris and Hiram Abiff in Freemasonry

Hiram Abiff = Osiris

...in Masonry or at least in the Cryptic Degrees/Cryptic Masonry. I would like to add, though, that there is an element of Horus to his story as well. I say Horus and not merely Osiris because of Hiram being known as the Widow's Son. In the context of the story of Hiram Abiff as a parallel to some of the teachings of (unknown) mystery schools of Egypt, the Window's Son was Horus, not Osiris. Horus is the one who's father was dead when he was born, thus being the son of a widow. This works well with the general Masonic obsession with Horus in all other spheres...namely the use of the Eye of Horus and related symbolism. But with Hiram Abiff Osiris is more significant. The version of the Osiris myth that is passed on in Masonry is as follows:

Scripture informs us that there were some Jews in bondage in Egypt, and that they were influenced by some of the beliefs of the Egyptians. Some of the Jews even studied and learned under the wise Egyptians. In Egyptian mythology there is a story about a great ruler named Osiris. According to the story this great ruler was the victim of a conspiracy by his brother, Seth. Legend has it that Osiris' brother Seth invited Osiris to a banquet that was in his honor. Prior to the banquet, Seth and his co-conspirators made a chest exactly to the measurements of Osiris' body. During the entertainment, Seth presented the chest and promised to give it to anyone whose body could most conveniently fit into it. The legend goes on to say that after several people tried unsuccessfully to fit into it, Osiris gave it a try and it fitted him perfectly. Immediately after he laid down in the chest, Seth and his seventy-two conspirators rushed to the box, clamped the cover and nailed it shut. The chest with Osiris in it was then cast into the Nile River.

According to the Myth, there were those who loved Osiris and respected his leadership abilities and his great qualities. One such person was his sister-wife Isis. We are informed that when she heard of Osiris' death, she cut off one of the locks of her hair and put on the "mourning apparel of widowhood." Isis searched diligently all throughout Egypt, questing everyone she came in contact with. She is finally informed by some young children that the chest or coffin was lodged in the branches of a bush of the tamarind tree, and that the chest was concealed in the trunk of the tree. Isis retrieved the chest and took Osiris' body back to Egypt.

Later, Seth came upon the body of Osiris and this time being more determined to get rid of Osiris, cut his body up into fourteen pieces, and scattered them throughout Egypt. Isis then began another search, except this time she was not just looking for one body, she was looking for fourteen pieces of the body. It is said that she found every piece except one, the phallus (penis). Being unable to recover the original organ, she made a substitute phallus of gold. pgs 85-6, Freemasonry, Ancient Egypt and the Islamic Destiny by Mustafa El-Amin

Albert Pike also adds:

Isis was also aided in her search by Anubis in the shape of a dog. He was Sirius or the Dog-Star, the friend and counsellor of Osiris, and the inventor of language, grammar, astronomy... pg 376, Morals and Dogma

The significance of these myths can be superficially found in the various other orders that are out there such as: the Order of Alhambra, the Daughters of Isis, the Daughters of the Nile, the Daughters of the Sphinx and the Ancient Egyptian Order of Sciotis to name a few. I also want to stress that these are their interpretation of the events that happened and not the only way the myths can be understood as I've discussed in previous posts and my video about Set(h). Nevertheless this understanding of the myth has parallels to the murder of Hiram Abiff and other more esoteric factors concerning it all. The theory behind this is that it came about from the cultural exchange between the Egyptians and the Jews, with Jews being the inheritors of the Egyptian mysteries and attention subsequently shifted from North Africa to the Judeo-Christian tradition.

"The Jews took the story of Osiris and changed it to the story of the mythical Hiram Abiff."

C.W. Leadbeater explains, "Although our modern Freemasonic rites and symbols are derived from Egypt...they have reached us for the most part through the Jews." (pages 86-7 in Freemasonry, Ancient Egypt and the Islamic Destiny)

An important point to also make is that Jesus (as) is considered the incarnation of Horus and the continuation of the mythos. Unfortunately, many sources have disinfo that links "Jesus" with Osiris and not Horus. The confusion is moreso again because of Hiram Abiff being called the Widow's Son. That epithet doesn't apply to Jesus (as). At any rate, all you have to do is search "Horus" in YouTube and you will get several videos saying that Horus is the original Jesus. One is even titled "Christianity is a[n] Egyptian Myth." But, I've already compared Jesus (as) to Horus, showing Horus is the incarnation of the dajjal i.e. antichrist.

Quotes from Éliphas Lévi and Arthur Edward Waite Concerning Freemasonic and Illuminati Beliefs

Quotes taken from:
The Mysteries of Magic: A Digest of the Writings of Éliphas Lévi.

Arthur Edward Waite is from whom we get the classic Waite tarot deck that is the standard upon which other tarot are based (granted that tarot comes from la Vecchia Religione of Italy).

There are many things I could quote from this work. It brings up some of the basic points surrounding the occult in its various manifestations but rarely blatantly (when connected to Judeo-Christian beliefs). In sum, a lot of it is explaining the inherent use of magick in everything, which is part and parcel of the more secretive belief of Jesus as a sort of magician and "Lucifer" as a savior (some traditional pagan traditions replace Lucifer with Diana Luciferans) and the not-at-all-secret assertion that predominates the occult world today, and even popular culture, that Soloman (as) was the father of Kabbalah and magick (astaghfirAllah to these lies--all of which Islam addresses especially concerning Solomon not being an idolater or magician and why people say he was).

On Solomon (as):

There are two classes of seers, the instinctive and the initiated. This is why children, ignorant persons, shepherds, and even idiots have more tendency to natural divination than shcolars and thinkers. The simple herd-boy David, was a prophet even as Solomon, the King of the Kabbalists and Magi. pg 223

On the importance of the Pentagram:

But the Pentagram, profaned though it may be by men, shines unclouded for ever in the right hand of the Word of truth, and the inspired voice promises to whomsoever shall conquer, that he will give him the morning staar--a solemn restitution held out to the star of Lucifer. pg 140

On the importance of Kabbalah:

All truly dogmatic religions have issued from the Kabbalah and return therin; whatever is scientific and grandiose in the religious dreams of all illuminati--Jacob Boehmen, Swedenborg, Saint Martin, and the rest--has been borrowed from the Kabbalah; all masonic associations owe their secrets and their symbols thereto. The Kabbalah alone consecrates the alliance of universal reason and the Divine Word: it establishes by the counterpoise of two forces in apparent opposition, the eternal balance of existence; it reconciles reason with faith, power with liberty, knowledge with mystery; it has the keys of the present, past and future. pg 18 (Introduction)

One reason why T.E. Lawrence (i.e. "Lawrence of Arabia" who set the foundations for the collapse of the Islamic State) carried The Golden Ass of Apuleius with him:

After the colossal fable of Oedipus we find the graceful poem of Psyche, of which Apuleius was certainly not the inventor. The Great Magic Arcanum reappears herein under the image of the mysterious union between a god and a weak mortal, who is abandoned naked and alone upon a rock. Psyche must remain ignorant of the secret of his ideal royalty and if she behold her husband, she must lose him. Here Apuleius annotates and interprets the allegoires of Moses, but did not the Elohim and the gods of Apuleius alike issue from the sanctuaries of Memphis and Thebes? Psyche is the sister of Eve, or rather, she is Eve spiritualised. Both desire to know and lose innocence for the honour of the trial. Both deserve to descend into Hades, one to carry away the antique box of Pandora, the other to seek and to crush the serpent's head, the symbol of time and evil. Both commit the crime which must be expiated by the Prometheus of ancient days and the Lucifer of Christian legend, the one delivered by Hercules the other conquered by the Saviour. After the wonderful gold ass of Apuleius we find no more magical epics. pg 15 (Introduction)

On use of sun/moon imagery and light symbolism:

The Great Magic Agent is the fourth emanation of the life-principle, of which the sun is the third form (see the initiates of the Alexandrian School and the dogma of Hermes Trismegistus) for the day-star is only the reflection and material shadow of the sun of truth which illuminates the intellectual world and which itself is but a gleam borrowed from the Absolute. The sun of the divine world is the infinite, spiritual and uncreated light; this light is, so to speak, verbalised in the philosophical world, and becomes the focus of the souls and of the truth; then it is incorporated and changed into visible light in the sun of the third world, the central sun of suns, of which the fixed stars are the immortal sparks.

Thus the world's eye, as the ancients called it, is the mirage of the reflection of God, and the soul of the earth is a permanent glance from the sun which the earth concieves and conserves by impregnation. The moon concurs in this impregnation of the earth by projecting towards her a solar image during the night so that Hermes was correct when he said, speaking of the Great Agent, "The sun is its sire, the moon its mother."...

The Astral Light was the instrument of the omnipotence of Adam, and afterwards became that of his punishment, being disturbed by his fall which intermingled an impure reflection with those primitive images that composed, for his still maiden imagination, the book of universal knowledge. The fall of Adam, according to the initiators, was an erotic intoxication which rendered his generation the slave of the fatal light; all amorous passion is a whirlpool of this light which draws us towards the abyss of death. pgs. 76 & 78

More on light imagery and significant symbols:

The Great Magical Secret is represented by the lamp and poniard of Psyche, the apple of Eve, the fire stolen from heaven by Prometheus, the burning sceptre of Lucifer, but also by the Cross of the Redeemer. It is the ring of Gyges, the Golden Fleece, the allegorical picture of Cebes, which is its most audaacious demonstration. It is also represented by the lingam, for the Great Arcanum is connected with the mystery of universal generation, and by the serpent pierced with an arrow, which formed the seal of Cagliostro. pg 89

Again, there is much more in that work. I'm just giving pieces of it. I've seen some of this book quoted elsewhere, such as here, but the version that I have access to does not have the material that is mentioned on that site. I don't know if its a mis-identification of the source or slightly different publican or what.

Why America for the New World Order?

This is just me piecing different things together based on my Islamic beliefs about the antichrist and what not. There are many mundane reasons for why America is the land of the Freemasons and the Illuminati agenda such as it being a fresh start, it being initially dominated--power and influence-wise--by Freemasonic planters et al. I'm not discounting the validity of those. I'm just suggesting that their could be even further reasons. I'm asserting this not because of basic dot-connecting, but because of an incident well before the European "discovery" of what became America. Certain things stand out to me as clues.

Other individuals have pointed out that America merely inherited a legacy from Britain and Europe. They've done more research on it then me and are way more pious than me, so let me refer to one to expand awareness : Dajjal - The False Messiah by Imran Husein (clips from this long lecture have been featured in many videos).

To understand the points I'm going to bring up, you must first familiarize yourself with the hadith discussing an incident that happened to some Arab(?) Christians. It is greatly discussed in a work of Ibn Kathir, but unfortunately I do not know Arabic and the English translation varies depending on the publisher. Basically, it's his work about the End Times, signs of it and what will come. The hadith in question, generally known as the Hadith of Fatima, can be read here in full. Important points:

They came to an island after being presumably lost at sea for about a month

There was a mysterious hairy creature on the island

There was a monastery and inside of it was chained the dajjal (antichrist)

If the story is accurate, and for this post the argument is made that it is, all we know is that it took them about a month to reach the island. We know nothing about from where they left, or what the island looked like or even what the monastery looked like.

The hadith further goes on to explain that the dajjal will be from the East and that was repeated for emphasis, meaning get it in your head, he's coming from the East. Another, much shorter, hadith says the same but specifically points to Khurasan and adds that his followers will have faces that are flat "like shields." Others say that he will emerge with Jewish followers from Isfahan, Iran. So much for the East vs West conflict that is propagandized. Yet, for some reason despite the emphasis on East, Imran Husein says dajjal was in Britain during the incident and was simply just moved. If movement is possible, or if he ever became unchained and does not simply rise up as Dajjal when the time is right, my argument is that it wasn't Britain, but America that the lost Christian sailors landed on. Here is why:

1. Columbus' unintentional voyage to America took 29 days from the Canary Islands, which are off the coast of North Africa, to the Bahamas/Turks/Caicos. IF the travelers left from somewhere around there, America is very plausible landing site for getting lost at sea for a month.

2. North America was generally considered an island by the indigenous population. This really became popular in the '70s where to counter the ethnocentric white "discovery of America," some Native Americans en mass began to refer to the continent as its original pan-nation/tribe designation (for some, not all Native Americans of course) Turtle Island. This is still in use today.

3. There is no denying the fact that North America is the home of hairy bipedal creature legends i.e. Sasquatch, Bigfoot, Skunk Ape and all other varying terms more so than any other country that shares the same folklore and slightly similar sightings. Not only that, but the sightings described generally involve the creature running away, or throwing rocks or boulders and other such things that result in hiding or sneaking around. The one in the hadith called himself al Jassasah, meaning spy. That's a good name for a creature that acts furtively in eyewitness descriptions! Unfortunately though, the creature generally does not speak in any sightings. With the speech it almost resembles Enkidu of Mesopotamian mythology. Perhaps, though, it simply has nothing to say to anyone else that sees it.

4. In the ancient Southeast region of America during the Mississippian era, there was a belief system in place (formally known as the "Southern Death Cult") that utilized significant one-eye imagery and, as far as we know, a good god and a horned snake god. The one-eyed imagery is strange in that it's often connected to a circle symbol that resembles a vulva (think of the a-okay sign made by Lady Gaga and co.). It's generally associated with supernatural forces/other spheres of existence. The other strange factor is that it has a close resemblance, in some depictions, to the hamza or hand of Fatima prevalent in North Africa and originating in the occult traditions of the ancient Phoenician pagans, who believed it to have been a representation of their supreme deity. This eye/vulva connection existed in the Phoenician belief system as well (image below is from the Mississippian tradition):
In addition to the one-eyed imagery, there was a major character known to us as the "Birdman" who appeared in the form of a falcon, much like the Egyptian Horus, whom I've already connected to the Dajjal and Freemasons/Illuminati in great detail. I don't believe that the Egyptians came over and gave the Mississippians a belief in Horus. It seems to be more of a repeated theme based on certain occult truths. Luckily, Wikipedia goes into great detail about all that we know about it publicly (I'm sure a lot is kept among family traditions, like with other esoteric religions that survive today). I highly recommend checking out what Wikipedia has for it. It describes the belief in Red Horn, who also bears the epithet Morning Star, just like Shaytan/Lucifer in his various incarnations.

5. There is evidence to suggest that ancient people had been stumbling upon North America for a long time. A Google search of "ancient coins found in America" will generate some links on the subject. It's rather taboo because of its use by Mormons and others to suggest that Native American cultures are just borrowings of other cultures, or that Jesus (as) came to everyone and various other theories. Although there are a number of false claims out there, this subject is often covered a lot in publications that deal with non-mainstream archaeology/"forbidden archaeology." I think it is reasonable to suggest that people could have gotten shipwrecked or whatever on North America and left behind traces of their presence. This gives strength to the possibility that the Christians were one such people.

6. This may be stretching it, but the Disney film, The Road to El Dorado, which, like the film Stargate, is a direct copy of the movie The Man Who Would Be King, and is blatant Masonic propaganda set in "The New World" without utilizing any one culture. The original film is about white men coming to "primitive people" who worship a one-eyed god and see Sean Connery with a Masonic Eye of Horus necklace and consider him god. "Hijinx" as the Bohemian Grove members would say, soon ensue. It's overall extremely strange that this concept would be transferred directly to a childrens' movie about El Dorado (mythical City of Gold) but it was despite Stargate having already directly used the concept. Could be suggestive of the importance of "the New World" (blurred between Meso and South America and fictional Atlantis) to the Freemasons. This website goes into great detail about the repeated adaption of The Man Who Would Be King in films, with a side-by-side analysis of The Road to El Dorado with it.

7. Some of the inheritors of the "Southern Death Cult" (pretty insulting name for an entire religion, unless it was merely a cult and not the primary belief system in place) became known by the early whites as being part of the "Civilized Tribes"--a status given to them for their ability to easily conform to white culture, attitudes and behaviors. Of course, they were never good enough which makes one wonder the exact reason for such designation if the attitude was "once an Indian always an Indian." It was also common for their mounds to have been raided, with ceremonial artifacts stolen. In one episode of the television show Paranormal State, I saw an obelisk monument on top of or parallel (can't remember) one such burial mound. Likewise, burial mounds that are desecrated are synonymous with hauntings and demon activity in popular culture. You don't see this anywhere else. When Israelis build things over Palestinian graves, there are no reports of supernatural activity despite them also being an "other."

The only things that can't be explained off-hand are the "monastery" and the chains if America was the "island" of the Dajjal. Other cultures, of course, had their own monasteries--it's not a purely Christian concept. But, I know of none having existed in ancient America. As for the chains, if the Dajjal is moved around or was bound long ago, that could explain that anomaly. Even in Norse mythology the "devilish" Loki is said to have been bound until the End Times, when he will break free and lead the world into the final battle so it is at least not unique to Islam.

Whether my speculation that the island with Dajjal was actually America is right or not , I really just wanted to bring certain details into light, especially the "Southern Death Cult" and its similarity to the beliefs of the ancient Phoenicians and Egyptians. Perhaps some more investigation can come from it, which is always beneficial in my opinion.

Reblogging: Illuminati - New World Order Game (1995)

The video below came from this blog post at New World Order Thesis, which has more videos posted. The card game, in my opinion, is rather creepy. While some of it can be explained as merely tailoring the game to conspiracy theory beliefs and politics, other parts cannot.



The old World of Darkness games by White Wolf sometimes incorporated stuff that came from the occult or the realm of "conspiracy theory" or just the structure of secret societies, but it was always scattered and wrapped in fantasy. Like, for instance, there was a 'Council of Seven" vampires that ruled the controlling/manipulating kind of vampires and were the ones who really had the power and information and everything to keep those other manipulating vampires doing what they wanted. That is similar to the structure of Freemasonry, where no one knows the topmost Seven and all that. Likewise, real magick stuff was intermixed into the fantasy to create a whole race of "Mages." For instance, I see a lot of conspiracy pages talk about the movie Metropolis because of illusions to it by Lady Gaga and others. Well, in the game Metropolis was a Sons of Ether-type deal where magick is mixed with technology. There is a group of martial arts-focused mages known as the Akashic Brotherhood, but Akashic comes from theosophy and its belief in the akashic records, which is sort of like al Lawh al Mahfud in Islam, but that is more about everything and not accessible to humans, and akashic records are about occult knowledge and all that.

There are many videos out there about 9/11 predictions in popular culture. Some can be explained as coincidences but others not so much. Take for instance, 9/11 being predicted in The Lone Gunman.

Merenptah: Firaun of Musa (as) -- Video

My second video, inspired by my less-detailed post on the same subject. For convenience I used the Arabic names. Firaun = Pharaoh, Musa = Moses.

Occult References in Shutter Island

No significant discussion of plot i.e. no major spoilers. Just things I observed in the background, with two exceptions.

In the psychiatrist's office were the following things that seemed peculiar to me:

bookcase dedicated to the so-called Venus figurines of the paleolithic era (but scaled larger) and other mother goddess figurines

statue of Pan

statue of Silenus

statue of Marcus Aurelius (probably unimportant but they focused on it in a scene)

In a mausoleum:

Masonic Eye of Horus in stained glass, looking down at the characters

Dove with rays of light shining down, forming a pyramid
(not longer after the characters are blasted by extremely bright light)
There was a single obelisk in the cemetery but they are so common it could be just for decor.

In an inmate's cell:

Upside-down pentagram with Baphomet's head inside of it, plain as day in one shot. There were also two airplanes, I think, but I was distracted by the symbol. The atomic bomb was mentioned multiple times in the film, so could have been a possible reference to that.


Reference to both the Dajjal & Masonic Beliefs/Imagery (VERY MINIMAL PLOT DISCUSSION):

A pryomaniac man is mentioned as having two different colored eyes. In my head I was imagining the usual: one green, one blue. Instead the man had one blue and one defective i.e. white...like in my Facebook icon except not bulging. He also had a nasty scar. Anytime I see this kind of thing with scars, I imagine it being used as an excuse for why Dajjal's forehead could have KFR on it. But I digress...

So, this one-eyed man was obsessed with fire, burning things. Most importantly, it was repeated that he would be found in a LIGHTHOUSE. Ironically, I was watching this film in a movie theater across from the Masonic memorial that was designed to look like the Lighthouse of Alexandria. For more of a dajjal reference, the whole thing is on an island, though of course the lighthouse was farther out.

--

There is a strange scene in which dialogue is exchanged about God and violence. The antagonizing character naturally makes a Satanic argument, "God loves violence, look at this..." (meaning violence of the natural world i.e. a hurricane) and goes on about men being violent and that's what we are because of God "God gave us violence to wage in His honor." The main character argues that God gave us moral laws and the man asks where are the moral laws "in this" (meaning natural world). The conversation ends with a reference to the fight between Horus and Set and possibly the Masonic incarnation of Horus: "If I were to sink my teeth, right now, into your eye, would you be able to stop me before I blinded you?"

The pagan stuff found in the office seem to correlate well with these speculations on God, human nature, the natural world and free will.

Set, An Islamic Perspective (Experimenting with Video Making)

I've never made a YouTube video before--this is my first. I decided to go with an easy subject, a basic summary of Set versus Horus and how Horus and his modern day worship relates to the Dajjal (antichrist).

Please feel free to spread it around and to discuss it. I couldn't fit much text into each frame, so I summed it all up as best as I could.

Horus at the Oscars

A link worth checking out:

Osiris, the Oscars and the Babylon Gate

What fascinates about the mysterious origin of Horus is the presence of very similar Sun gods in distant parts of the world, who seem to have echoes of Horus in both appearance and name.

And what of Oscar himself? Well, as others have pointed out, he bears a very strong resemblance to Ptah, the god of craftsmen (read: "masons") and often syncretized with Osiris. Oscar is also reminiscent of some depictions of Osiris himself, all the more fascinating when you consider his Egyptian name is the pseudo-homophonic Ausur. Or that no one can seem to agree where the name "Oscar" actually came from.

For more information on Ptah and Horus:

Who was the Pharaoh of Moses (as)

Understanding the Egyptian God Set from Islamic Standpoint

Lady Gaga as the Lady in Red

Jay-Z and the Eye of Horus

All Dajjal Roads Lead to Horus -- Horus as Antichrist & Crowley's God

Lady Gaga - wHore for Horus

Horus as Dajjal -- Comparison with the Christ (as)

Horus as the Dajjal (Antichrist) -- Comparison with the Christ (as)

I just need to preface to new readers and people who haven't noticed my profile blurb that I am not Christian, but Muslim. I accept Jesus (as) as prophet, but not as God. I do personally believe that some paganism got mixed into Christianity, but unlike the Zeitgeist film and some websites, I do not believe that that justifies claiming there was no Jesus (as). Prophets and their lives have been distorted since time immemorial and I'm almost 100% that Jesus (as) was not the first prophet to have been deified as I make references to in my posts about the Egyptian Set having originally been Seth (as).

I've discussed the case for the Egyptian god Horus having his roots in the actual Dajjal (antichrist) in many of my posts. Some people, however, look at it rather differently. They say that Horus was the Christ. Such is the case in this blog post: Just in time for the holidays...Attention: Your Jesus is a Crock. Well, that only makes it even easier for me to justify "Horus" as being the one-eyed antichrist! Let me quote their reasons for the assertion that the only Jesus (as) that existed was Horus:

*Horus was born of the virgin Isis-Meri on December 25th in a cave/manger with his birth being announced by a star in the East and attended by three wise men.

*His earthly father was named "Seb" ("Joseph"). Seb is also known as "Geb": "As Horus the Elder he...was believed to be the son of Geb and Nut." Lewis Spence, Ancient Egyptian Myths and Legends, 84.

*He was of royal descent.

*At age 12, he was a child teacher in the Temple, and at 30, he was baptized, having disappeared for 18 years.

*Horus was baptized in the river Eridanus or Iarutana (Jordan) by "Anup the Baptizer" ("John the Baptist"), who was decapitated.

*He had 12 disciples, two of whom were his "witnesses" and were named "Anup" and "Aan" (the two "Johns").

*He performed miracles, exorcised demons and raised El-Azarus ("El-Osiris"), from the dead.

*Horus walked on water.

*His personal epithet was "Iusa," the "ever-becoming son" of "Ptah," the "Father." He was thus called "Holy Child."

*He delivered a "Sermon on the Mount" and his followers recounted the "Sayings of Iusa."

*Horus was transfigured on the Mount.

*He was crucified between two thieves, buried for three days in a tomb, and resurrected.

*He was also the "Way, the Truth, the Light," "Messiah," "God's Anointed Son," the "Son of Man," the "Good Shepherd," the "Lamb of God," the "Word made flesh," the "Word of Truth," etc.

*He was "the Fisher" and was associated with the Fish ("Ichthys"), Lamb and Lion.

*He came to fulfill the Law.

*Horus was called "the KRST," or "Anointed One."

*Like Jesus, "Horus was supposed to reign one thousand years."

Furthermore, inscribed about 3,500 years ago on the walls of the Temple at Luxor were images of the Annunciation, Immaculate Conception, Birth and Adoration of Horus, with Thoth announcing to the Virgin Isis that she will conceive Horus; with Kneph, the "Holy Ghost," impregnating the virgin; and with the infant being attended by three kings, or magi, bearing gifts. In addition, in the catacombs at Rome are pictures of the baby Horus being held by the virgin mother Isis--the original "Madonna and Child."

Just some things I should point out since it gets repeated over and over:

Isis was not technically a virgin. She gave birth to Horus using magick when she fashioned a phallus and had sex with it. The "immaculate conception" came about from the magick, which involved stealing Ra's power. That is the original reason for why Set killed Osiris because Set was originally a defender of Ra (or sometimes Amun...basically--defender of the Creator). Horus would then be an abomination to Set (albeit people prefer to portray Set as sex-hungry for Horus).

Also, making the case for Seb being "Joseph" is weak at best. There was a Joseph that lived in Egyptian and he was known by variations of Yusuf. If one wants to break the name up and make it more Egyptian, the case would be stronger with "Sef." Additionally, the fish connection seems weak to me. It was Set who in popular mythology became a fisherman, not Horus. But again, when there are so many contradicting variations of all the Egyptian mythologies, maybe their is a line somewhere that puts the fishing onto Horus. Lastly, I'm skeptical that Horus had the epithet of "Messiah." That is a purely Hebrew concept.

IF the rest is true, then the case for Horus as the antichrist is even stronger. This is even moreso given the occult obsession with Horus in his various forms and its repetitive use and references in the media. The fact that one of his epithets was allegedly Iusa is especially convincing given that in Islam, Jesus (as) is known as Isa for linguistic reasons. In that epithet, Horus is also connected to Ptah. Well, I have previously connected Ptah worship to Firaun (Pharaoh) of Moses (as)--The Pharaoh being Merenptah with Moses as Amenmesse, so if all that is accurate, then it would a repeated theme of the evil individual claiming godhead being associated with Ptah.

One major and important difference between the real Christ (as) and Horus as the antichrist is that Horus was the god of kings, i.e. the god of the elite much like how the one-eyed Odin of Norse mythology was likewise a god of kings and the elite.

Associating Isis with Mary and Horus with Christ is not something Zeitgeist discovered on their own. It forms part of the teachings of theosophy and Madame Blavatsky, (presumably) later adopted by the Freemasons to further justify their adoption of the one-eyed god of the powerful under a Christian-friendly context.

And yes, there are other pagan deities and figures who are similar in their mythology to the Christian traditions of Jesus (as), but for the vast majority of them, if not all of them, there is very little connection to the dajjal i.e. antichrist like can be made with Horus. Various reasons can be given as to why they exist simultaneously with Jesus (as). At this time, I have little interest in expounding on it as it can be turned into its own post.

Diana in Bohemian Grove

Cross-dressing Bohemians performing some sort of play that includes a scene at an Artemis or Diana sanctuary.

Diana of the Roman pantheon is almost always associated exclusively with women except in certain sectors--traditional Italian witchcraft (stregheria) and Dianic Wicca. I'm highly skeptical that Bohemian Grove exists to worship Diana, especially on the basis of a photograph of a performance that may not have any sacred or ritualistic meaning. But, I'm offering the possibility that it may have some basis in truth.

According to this website, Diana, to the Freemasons, is a "symbol of imagination, sensibility, and the creative insanity of poets and artists." That seems kind of weird--outside of her realm unless you view her as the all-encompassing Mother Goddess figure. But then again some deities do overlap and some of their minor traits and associations get overshadowed over others. Perhaps that explains the display unless, of course, it was merely a single scene from a "Grove play." The ones that would fit are: The Hamadryads: A Masque of Apollo, The Atonement of Pan: A Music-Drama and Apollo: a Music-Drama but I'm really just guessing. I don't know the time period of the photograph, don't know if the list of plays on wikipedia are even accurate, and don't know that some other play couldn't have had that scene. The Masonic description of Diana, however, sets her up almost like the female opposite of Apollo moreso than traditional mythology does. That would fit the sun/moon duality of Freemasonry, Apollo representing the ultimate sun god (the sun being the most common thing worshiped as god, hence why in Islam certain times are avoided for prayers to not confuse with sun worship). Even before the formal existence of Freemasons, Apollo-worship was a noted characteristic of dictators and the like, even when they were brutal and bloodthirsty: Apollo in Roman Political Propaganda: Marians vs Sullans.

While the owl is not sacred to Diana per say, it is often associated with Hecate, whose aspects have often been blended into Diana's. If the two goddesses were combined, it'd be safe to say that the owl does represent knowledge as the Bohemian's claim, in addition to the much more obvious "dull cares" or alternately just "care." Unlike the owl of Athena/Minerva though, the knowledge that Diana/Hecate's owl represents is the knowledge of the obscure and the occult. It's where the word "trivia" comes from. Trivia is another Roman name of Hecate that is in relation to her three-fold nature and her also being the goddess of the crossroads (tri + via).


Hecate is certainly no stranger to the Freemasons/Illuminati. The Statue of Liberty was, oddly, based upon her as depictions of Hecate utilized both the unique pointed crown, and the torch. Hecate often carried two torches, albeit in representation of the "morning star," as one of her Greek epithets was Phosphoros (light-bringer aka the Morning Star). Morning Star is an alternate reference to Lucifer (light-bearer, Latin version), and one of the primary aspects of Diana is Lucifera aka Diana Lucifera aka Diana, the light-bearer. While two torches would fit better for dualistic purposes, the one torch is a much more powerful symbol.

Reblogging - Ron Paul & the Illuminati Agenda

Change doesn't come in the form of a black president, and it certainly doesn't come in the form of someone--an elite--who would be using the same, broken system. That's not what revolution has ever been about. Revolutions are most successful from the bottom up, not the top down. When it's the top down--like the American revolution--the stage is set for future oppression. The way that is done is through nice lingo that is not actually implemented in full--ever. The exception is when the revolutionary ideology has a major flaw (usually one involving idealism)--in which case a bottom up revolution will also be oppressive.

You cannot make a revolution with silk gloves - Stalin

While Stalin was hypocritical and sociopathic, he was speaking the truth there. Even in Islam silk is forbidden to men for the purposes of humility and simplicity--getting rid of the arrogance, elitism and class disconnect to offer an alternative that favors the poor and the helpless, those who have no voice in an oppressive society. Aside from the class reference, the quote also means "without getting dirty." Of course, that's not to be taken in an ends justify the means way in my use of the quote. Malcolm X summarizes the idea nicely:

You don't have a peaceful revolution. You don't have a turn-the-other-cheek revolution. There's no such thing as nonviolent revolution. Revolution is bloody. Revolution is hostile. Revolution knows no compromise. Revolution overturns and destroys everything that gets in its way.

Ron Paul - Illuminati Hand Signs and Handshakes.

Google Search Results: Ron Paul + Mason

Beware disinformation--it's real and is almost always presented as something mundane i.e. some truth mixed with falsehoods. That is how devils have always worked. If disinformation were always obvious (i.e. always just "out there" theories), what good would it serve in causing confusion and leading people astray?

Starbucks is the Devil, Literally?

I just want to say that I never go to Starbucks, so would never have come to this conclusion without some help. One of my friend's pointed this out, and it's really hard to miss. The revised Starbucks logo looks like the head of Baphomet upside-down. Not only that, but it's flanked by two inverted (filled in) pentagrams. Seriously.

Given its support for the murderous state of Israel (not antisemitism, I believe the US is worse), not all that surprised.

Brief Thoughts on Modern Mother Nature Worship

This is an observation I've had for some time that many people are not even aware of. When it comes to things in the natural world, it's almost always attributed to nature. Sometimes it's specified as "Mother Nature," which actually personifies it not only as an obscure force, but as an entity. When a natural disaster occurs, it's acceptable to say "Mother Nature must be angry" and our crime is always "because we disrespect the planet" or "because we litter" or because "there are too many of us." The majority of people who say this are the wealthy, by the way.

In the children's book Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightening Thief, because of man's propensity to disrespect the earth, the "great god Pan" is in hiding. Of course the book makes absolutely no mention of the true nature of Pan, or of satyrs in general, or of the fact that littering is nothing new but the exploitation of so-called "third world countries" is. The idiotic and drug-addled fiend Aleister Crowley loved Pan. So did some folks of Bohemian Grove. Really appropriate for children's books. The books also replace "rape" with "dating" further establishing that promiscuity is okay, but also confusing them about the actual nature of the myths--myths that should not be praised as they put the worst qualities of humanity onto deities. (As a further aside, the books also teach neopaganism 101--how to give a modern sacrifice in the Hellenic tradition)

Nothing is ever about how people treat one another, and nothing can ever be attributed to God even if it's in a generic non-religious way. It's not Allah, God, the Creator that created everything, it's Mother Nature or alternately, Nature with a capital N (explained on one episode of Sesame Street where the guest comedian was pretending to be a survivalist). Somewhat related, this is why atheism is nonsensical--they replace God with other things in an attempt to be intellectually superior, that's all.

What's worse is that aboriginal people are exploited and held up to be the standard carriers for the call to respect and recognize Mother Earth. It doesn't matter that the majority of indigenous religions were not "Mother Earth/Father Sky" worshipers, but were worshipers of a Creator. This is of course lost given what knowledge survives colonialism and cultural fads, and what doesn't. Hollywood's current biggest hit, Avatar, is an example of this. Mother Earth is suffering and unless you stop exploiting Mother Earth, nothing will be right. Humans are always the last priority. It's Earth --> Animals --> Humans despite the claim that everything is interconnected.

It should also be noted that when "Mother Earth" in various forms was worshiped by civilizations, humanity suffered. Women were oppressed--not even considered on the same level as men--humans were sacrificed, enslaved, countries taken and plundered, and in the case of the tree-loving Druids, humans were sacrificed and even eaten in some cases. Worshiping or respecting Mother Earth has historically never changed the inner aspects of men, did not make the world a better place, not even for womankind. While people may argue that that is the same with the monotheistic faiths, the reality is that those who are sincere and willing to put knowledge into practice, are seriously transformed: spiritually, mentally and sometimes even physically by adopting attitudes such faiths teach that are not taught by the others (or are taught but never emphasized. For instance: fill your stomach with 1/3 food, 1/3 water and 1/3 air (nothing) and give your food freely to the poor and the needy and your neighbors even if it means that you will go hungry for a night.

Lady Gaga - wHore for Horus (i.e. Dajjal, antichrist)

Since many people probably think any connection between Lady Gaga and Horus worship of the occult elite is just coincidence, let me present the following (as usual, clicking on the photos will bring up their original size):

Double Eye of Horus, made with her parted hair and her eye, and the other with her breast and the triangular harness with her nipple being the "eye":


The label for this picture says it all: "Lady Gaga on Masonic Throne"


Sequence from a performance:

An up-close scene from the same performance. The eye in the Eye of Horus design is actually her own, and in addition to the simple jacket design, she's throwing the 6 symbol (backwards), which is my belief is actually a symbol for the Egyptian Wadjet, a primeval snake goddess that also utilizes the Eye of Horus, and not necessarily 666 because of the sign being used by both hands and in reverse. Like Horus, Wadjet is closely associated with pharaohs, which leads to Firaun i.e. declaring oneself God. For those unfamiliar with conspiracy theories, the "okay" hand symbol is one that is frequently used by artists at random times and places.

Despite being sideways, she's still making a triangle with her eye:

One of many one-eyed styles she's used (here's another and another and another and another and another and another ad nauseum) . Want to add that Lady Gaga is not being "original" or unique with the one-eyed imagery in the music industry. It's not just her thing. Like the 6 symbol, it is found throughout, but especially among female artists:

In paganism and also in occult, any one-eyed god is usually symbolized by the sun and moon. The intact eye representing the sun and the missing eye the moon (Odin, Horus, Wadjet etc). The Eye of Horus gets complicated because mythology says it's actually the eye that was plucked and not the seeing eye. However, this can be exampled by cultural-historical distortion as is common in religion. Dajjal's seeing eye is believed to be the "Eye of Providence" and hence why it is that eye that is the light. Also note in the screencap below, Lady Gaga is making the 6 symbol over the darkened eye. I believe that gives more strength to the Wadjet argument because aside from being a goddess with a darker aspect, her one-eye is also correlated as the Eye of the Moon.

The one-eyed imagery is even used outside of herself in her videos:

Many people have noticed these things with Lady Gaga and have made videos, blogs and pages. Here is one example of a pretty good video. My only criticism of it is the very end when it tries to connect the peace symbol to the occult, and to runes and to Nazism. Hitler was not at all interested in paganism. He thought it would symbolize backwardness. He was interested only in the popular occult theories of the time concerning the "Aryan race" and their related symbolism.

Dajjal References in "The Marvelous Misadventures of Flapjack"

Before I begin, I want to say that The Marvelous Misadventures of Flapjack is my favorite cartoon. I love it, my son loves it. But unfortunately, I can't explain the depiction of Poseidon in one episode, and a one-eyed octopus named Eight-Armed Willy in another. It could be completely random and unintentional (Poseidon also had a shark in his mouth and the eyepatch is traditional nautical imagery especially for a rough and beaten character), but it was really strange and too much like the traditional description of Dajjal with one eye that's blind and protrudes like a floating grape.

The primary episode in question is "Candy Cruise Blues." The storyline is unimportant. What is important is that for no explainable reason, Poseidon is squinting his right eye while he talks to the characters, and this is for a little while. When he is finally given what he demands (a body part), he opens his right eye, and it bulges out. In the center of it is a starfish even though his other eye is normal looking. Furthermore, when he reveals his weird right eye, his voice changes and gets deep and disturbing. Unfortunately, there are no screencaps that I could find, but I was able to find this recreation of Poseidon, although its of the wrong eye, and in the episode, Poseidon was in profile so you could see the eye protrude out (since it has someone in it, I'm keeping it as a hyperlink). In this rough sketch, Poseidon's eye looks normal, although it's bulging, but it's mostly just cartoon emphasis. It's taken from an episode where Poseidon never squints his one eye when out of the water, nor does his eye look remarkable beyond having a starfish on it.

As for the depiction of Eight-Armed Willy, almost all of the time he has his eyepatch on, which is relatively insignificant. However, in one episode (I forgot which), his eyepatch is lifted and he reveals again a white bulging eye, but one that has something faint inside of it, just like the description of the Dajjal's left eye ("there will be a thick fingernail-like object in the left eye"). It was as if both descriptions of Dajjal's eyes were combined together for the right eye of Eight-Armed Willy. In the show it's always the right eye that's defective. Again, I apologize for not having a screencap of it.

In sum, it seems weird that Poseidon would be used to convey such a concept, that Poseidon would be squinting in one episode in general. He could have just had the two uneven eyes and it would have been unremarkable.

There is some discussion about Poseidon and Freemaonsry/NWO here. What's important to note is that the "Grove Play" that is scheduled for this year--2010--for Bohemian Grove is called "Atlantis" according to Wikipedia. Pretty strange...

Child Sacrifice is Real in the West

And child sacrifice has always been real. It was practiced by the ancient Cretans, the Carthaginians, the Druids, the Natchez, the Inca and on and on. Even the Neanderthal cannibalism of children has recently been discovered. Most of the cultures that did engage in it were vanquished or vanished. One of the most famous is incidents of child sacrifice that can be substantiated with archaeological evidence involved ancient Crete. According to legend, seven virgins and seven youths had to be being given by the Athenians as tribute to Crete for their Minotaur. The Greek hero Theseus put a stop to that by pretending to be one of the youths and subsequently killing the Minotaur. Remember, while movies and popular culture typically portray the virgins as being in their teenagers years at least, it is more likely that, especially with girls, the victims were fairly young (even in the much later Byzantine Empire, marriage was valid at the age of 8). Carthaginian child sacrifice is best documented in Lucian's work De Dea Syria, which is actually a very popular work among occultists, Alan Moore being one example (this is much like the popularity of The Golden Ass by Apuleius, a book that was always carried by T.E. Lawrence as he set the stage for the screwing up of the entire Muslim world).


There is a Masters of Horror episode that's called The Washingtonians that portrays George Washington and his followers as cannibals. While that is just fiction based on a short story, some things are not. Take for instance, the discovery of the bodies of six children and four adults who had been dissected, sawed, cut and drilled under the London house Benjamin Franklin lived in. The bodies were dated to when he was actually staying there. For such a strange find, it hardly gets any attention. Even in the article, they attribute it to the doctor and portray Franklin as mostly being innocent and ignorant. There is no mention of Franklin's occult activities, especially in England with the Hellfire Club. The Hellfire Club's whole motto was fais ce que tu voudras, which means "do what thou wilt." That's the motto later adopted by the Horus-worshiping Aleister Crowley and flaunted by Horus-worshiping Jay-Z:


Because of the varying ways the remains of those victims were violated, the inclination to accept that they were used for autopsies seems to be the most logical explanation. This is especially the case because sacrifices of any type are meant for the god or spirit alone, and are not to be desecrated. The only exception is the initial slaughter, where, in the case of animals, the worthy organs were burned and the rest given to the devoted populace to eat. That is why in Islam, animals slaughtered by pagans who had invoked a pagan name could not be eaten--the animals were fed to both the gods and the people. It had nothing to do with monolatry. In the recent discovery of the truth behind Druid human sacrifice and cannibalism (which has also been verified by evidence found supporting the claims of people burned inside "wicker men" or wicker baskets), the human sacrifices were rather haphazard and messy--almost similar to some early sacrifices of prisoners in ancient South America. The victims were bashed in the head and then dismembered, with evidence that they were searching for the marrow to eat. This connects to Ben Franklin in that a lot of the occult organizations, especially the future ones, would utilize the darker side of Druidism notably the headhunting symbolism, something also substantiated by archaeology. Mostly, skulls were put on display in niches.

Even in notorious Bohemian Grove there has been open references to the Druids with one year having the theme of "Druid Jinx" allegedly under the mantle of Christianity trumps paganism (despite the exceedingly pagan nature of the Grove). The ultimate irony is that in the trumping of paganism, the elites at Bohemian Grove almost always burn a "human effigy" in an elaborate (and corny) ritual involving a 40 ft. idol of an owl. In Alex Jones' infamous expose on the elite male-only club, he points out that the burning victim portrayed in the distributed pamphlets does not seem to resemble the size of an adult victim. Furthermore, during the sacrifice, as can be heard in the video, the screaming of Walter Cronkite or whoever is doing the voice-over for that particular scene is exceptionally loud and almost bloodcurdling. Certainly loud enough to mask a real scream. Additionally, from the boat ride to the site of the sacrifice, there is a pause and what is going on is hidden from the audience. Very strange for something that is supposed to be fake--why conceal anything if everyone knows it's fake? Again, this can be seen in the video. The eeriest thing of all, for me, has been this photo and its particular caption (click on it to see it larger):


In some Semitic cultures, the sacrifice of a "first born" was especially desired. There are no other photos of this young boy in Bohemian Grove as far as I know.

Alex Jones and others connect what goes on at Bohemian Grove to the worship of the deity Moloch. Regardless of the culture he was established in, Moloch worship generally demanded infant/child sacrifices, and generally one that involved a pyre rather than slaying. While I cannot testify that the owl represents Moloch (the animal doesn't fit the nature of Moloch), I can add that many, if not all, of the Bohemian Grove elites are also Freemasons. As is commonly known now thanks to popular culture, the Freemasons are obsessed with prophet Solomon (as). Their idea of Solomon, however, differs greatly from the real Solomon (as) as described by Allah in the Qur'an. To them, Solomon was not only a Moloch worshiper, but a magician and other things. This is understood best in a blurb found in a completely unrelated book, one that would be popular among the cross-dressing Bohemians:

Solomon, who had more "guts" than his father, and who would fit into the modern world as a gorgeous pagan, not only experimented freely in the choice of wives and concubines from all conceivable ranks of the heathen, but openly visited their "high places," as David doubtless had done secretly. Venus Castina, pg 28 (1928)

So, if a child were sacrificed to Moloch at Bohemian Grove or elsewhere, it would be rationalized as following in the way of a prophet.

Another idol of the Illuminati et al. has also allegedly shared some thoughts on child sacrifice:

A white male child of perfect innocence and intelligence makes the most suitable victim. - Aleister Crowley

Unfortunately, I don't have any source info for that quote other than its circulation on the web. If sacrificing to the child-god Hoor-Paar-Kraat, I can see where that would come from (sacrificing something that is like the deity, the race being chosen only for the symbolic color of innocence).

During 2002, 800,000 children went missing, with 200,000 being abducted by family members, 58,000 being abducted by "nonfamily members" and115 children being the victim of the extreme circumstances i.e. murder. As can be seen, the data is eight years old and not even entirely accurate. There are too many complexities involved to get more accurate statistics. Also, child trafficking is big business. Numerous scandals have surfaced about child abuse in regards to child trafficking and yet little is done. There's been the Boys Town scandal, Dynacorp scandal and the Franklin scandal, to name a few. They almost always involve extremely wealthy men--the elites of society. It is even discussed openly, such as when a former minister of France admitted that he loved going to Thailand to have sex with young boys, adding that it was exciting. He was one figure to have openly defended Roman Polanski's rape of a minor, and Polanski was the director who wrote Rosemary's Baby before his own infant was brutally murdered.

While child abuse is easier to understand and acknowledge than child sacrifice, it's still not a great leap of difference especially when you have all these paganism-obsessed cults that openly engage in "mock" sacrifices, among many other things. After all, to them "do what you want" is the law, and "wordly cares" (i.e. your good conscious thoughts) are to be burned (as dictated in Bohemian Grove).

Seth (as) in Gnosticism and the Occult (Brief)

This website is a pretty good website for getting an idea about how prophet Seth (as) is slandered, and how the false aspects of the Egyptian adoption/continuation of Seth are viewed and used in the occult and in mystical circles.

Example of Seth (as) in Christian Gnosticism from the Middle Ages (astaghfirAllah): The Quest of Seth for the Oil of Mercy

And a more generalized examination: The Gnostic Seth

In this article, the author discusses the Egyptian Seth and the idea of their conflict being primarily sexual--the blinding of Horus' eye, he claims, being a sexual metaphor of penetration and dominance.

For more information on the Gnostic idea of Seth (as), doing a search for "Sethianism" suffices. The above website links to the gnostic documents, though, and Wikipedia et al don't contribute that much else. The Gnostic Seth, and the Seth in other occult and pagan traditions can all be summed up as dualistic. Seth is not seen as a prophet, or defender of the Creator, or enemy of the One-Eyed, but as a simple opposing force, often with a mere superficial or symbolic rivalry with Horus. This is popularized in mainstream media with all the various references to symbols of Set in combination with symbols of Horus. The most mainstream example is the fashion statement made by Lady Gaga.

Insha'Allah these distortions can be distinguished and kept separate from the honorable Seth (as).

All Dajjal Roads Lead to Horus -- Horus as Antichrist & Crowley's God

I've already expounded on my theories about the distortion and transformation of extremely ancient events and the people that participated in them into pagan mythology where the "good guy" (prophet Seth) evolves over time into a"bad guy" (god of chaos Set) and its the bad guy image (god of storms, magick, abortion...everything associated with Apep i.e. Shaytan) that sticks due to the machinations of Shaytan.

In sum to refresh--using Western namesakes for simplicity of reference--prophet Seth (as), third son of Adam (as) teacher of true monotheism and warner of the flood of Noah (as), father of prophet Enoch (as) seems to have also been the blinder of Dajjal, the antichrist--known as Horus in Egyptian mythology. Mythology says that the eye had been speared. It's an appropriate reference because Dajjal will be killed by Jesus (as) with a spear.

So, aside from the Illuminati use of the udjat/wedjat i.e. Eye of Horus, where else can Horus worship that indicates a Dajjal-nature be found?

In Aleister Crowley.

I've already mentioned that he was a Horus worshiper, not a Set worshiper as one may imagine with the existence of the Crowley-like Temple of Set and other uses of Set as Shaytan. But, it's a lot more in-depth than that. After all, many neopagans worship or revere Horus. However, those types generally don't focus on the one eye, especially because mythology reports that Horus had his eye restored.

If you still have any doubts about regarding him (Dajjal), then remember, your Sustainer is not one-eyed.

I normally don't like to quote from Wikipedia, but it makes things really simple since there is so much information out there and none of it seems to narrow it down to Crowley's involvement and devotion to Horus quite as specifically:

In 1904, Crowley and his new wife Rose traveled to Egypt using the pseudonym of Prince and Princess Chioa Khan, titles which Crowley claimed had been bestowed upon him by an eastern potentate. During this time, according to Crowley's own account, Rose, who was pregnant, had become somewhat delusional, regularly informing him that "they are waiting for you". It was on 18 March, after Crowley sought the aid of the Egyptian god Thoth, that she actually revealed who the "they" were - the god Horus and his alleged messenger. She then led him to a nearby museum in Cairo where she showed him a seventh century BCE mortuary stele known as the Stele of Ankh-ef-en-Khonsu (it would later come to be revered in Thelema as the "Stele of Revealing"); Crowley was astounded for the exhibit's number was 666, the number of the beast. He took this all to be a sign and on 20 March began invoking the god Horus in his room. It was after this invocation that Rose, or as he now referred to her, Ouarda the Seeress, informed him that "the Equinox of the Gods had come".This referred to a more cosmic version of the regular Golden Dawn ritual of the Equinox, when they changed their initiating officer and password. The Equinox of the Gods supposedly replaces the office's ruling deity Osiris with Horus.

It was on 8 April that Crowley first heard a voice talking to him and calling itself Aiwass. The nature of Aiwass has never been fully explained. Crowley's disciple and secretary Israel Regardie believes that this voice came from Crowley's subconscious, but opinions among Thelemites differ widely. Aiwass claimed to be a messenger from the god Hoor-Paar-Kraat, meaning Horus as the child of Isis and Osiris. Crowley wrote down everything the voice told him over the course of the next three days, and subsequently titled it Liber AL vel Legis or The Book of the Law. The god's commands explained that a new Aeon for mankind had begun, and that Crowley would serve as its prophet. As a supreme moral law, it declared "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law", and that people should learn to live in tune with their "True Will."

To learn more about Horus' role in the Illuminati occult and with Crowley, read this article. This new age we live in, they consider to be the "Aeon of Horus." The worship is focused primarily on a child incarnation of Horus (Hoor-Paar-Kraat), which is Horus as the son of Isis and Osiris. This is interesting because there are hadith that mention Dajjal's parents, especially the mother, as being of a scheming nature. The tradition in paganism goes like this (summarizing from the book: The Dark Archetype: Exploring the Shadow Side of the Divine by Denise Dumars and Lori Nyx):

Set murdered Osiris, cutting him up into pieces and throwing them into the Nile, bringing chaos to the gods. Isis collected the pieces and put them together but could not find his phallus. Since she was a goddess of magick, she made one herself, had sex with it attached to dead Osiris, and from the magickal union, gave birth to Horus. Isis remained in hiding from Set, and Horus grew up desiring nothing more than vengeance. This is where the fight between Set and Horus comes into play. After it, Set was vanquished and Horus wanted to kill Set but Isis said no, for which Horus beheads her, his own mother. Set, meanwhile, ends up liveing the rest of his life as a simple fisherman despite being the enemy of Horus and despite Isis having been disposed of, thus giving Horus free reign to kill Set--never happens.

Clearly, things don't add up from an Islamic or even Christian point of view. Was the killing of Osiris murder or punishment? Was Osiris even a person or a smashed idol? What upsets "the gods" more than the condemnation of paganism? Isis had to resort to not only magick, but deviant magick to conceive a child that would eventually become one-eyed. This holy and illuminated child later killed his own mother, and while Set is supposedly the arch enemy, god of all things evil, he spends his days living life simply, like none other than a prophet.

The Horus that speaks through Aiwass wants revenge for his father. Something clearly happened where it was not finalized to desire that (again, why was Set left alone?). So, at any rate, how is this vengeance made manifest? By declaring Crowley a prophet who is to enlighten mankind about the glory of sinning--doing anything you want because it makes you feel good. That's a rather strange form of vengeance. It goes further:

In Crowley, we have a blatant false prophet whose master is Dajjal and Shaytan. Not only that, but there is a demon mocking Jibreel's (Gabriel) role of relaying the word of Allah (God). Furthermore, together, they create a book from the dictation (mocking the prophets), one that cannot even come close in beauty, mastery or complexity to the Qur'an, and add the oft repeated and very popular notion that there is no "evidence" for religion because nothing manifests before your eyes. Here is the quote from Crowley, himself. Clearly, we ARE in the Aeon of Horus--the age of the Dajjal.

"The existence of true religion presupposes that of some discarnate intelligence, whether we call him God or anything else. And this is exactly what no religion had ever proved scientifically. And this is what The Book of the Law does prove by internal evidence, altogether independent of any statement of mine. This proof is evidently the most important step in science that could possibly be made: for it opens up an entirely new avenue to knowledge. The immense superiority of this particular intelligence, AIWASS, to any other with which mankind has yet been in conscious communication is shown not merely by the character of the book itself, but by the fact of his comprehending perfectly the nature of the proof necessary to demonstrate the fact of his own existence and the conditions of that existence. And, further, having provided the proof required."